2019
DOI: 10.1108/jieb-10-2018-0044
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Faculty placement strategies for international higher education institutes

Abstract: Purpose This paper aims to focus on enhancing the learning experience for both expatriate academics and students in international higher education institutions (HEIs) through understanding students’ cultural perspectives, analyzing student feedback and evaluating faculty placement strategies. The analysis can be used to aid international educational programs in understanding student values and increasing the quality of instructor–student interaction. Design/methodology/approach This research surveyed over 1,… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…(2) although "expatriate scientist" or "expatriate academic" were the keywords in some articles, the research concerned librarians and students in Kazakhstan (Emmelhainz, 2016), administrative professionals (Witkowsky, 2020), or students' perceptions of teaching methods used by expatriate faculty (Khashan, 1984;Swanson and Swanson, 2019);…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…(2) although "expatriate scientist" or "expatriate academic" were the keywords in some articles, the research concerned librarians and students in Kazakhstan (Emmelhainz, 2016), administrative professionals (Witkowsky, 2020), or students' perceptions of teaching methods used by expatriate faculty (Khashan, 1984;Swanson and Swanson, 2019);…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Following the recommendation of Okoli (2015), because “ the process of excluding sources (and including respectively) has to be made as transparent as possible in order for the review to proof credibility” (p. 883), a detailed list of the excluded papers has been presented in Appendix (Source: Authors work). These articles were excluded from the final screening because:they were published in a newspaper (Sardar, 1980; Cantazaro, 2012) and one was a one-page comment rather than a research paper (Sin, 2012);although “expatriate scientist” or “expatriate academic” were the keywords in some articles, the research concerned librarians and students in Kazakhstan (Emmelhainz, 2016), administrative professionals (Witkowsky, 2020), or students' perceptions of teaching methods used by expatriate faculty (Khashan, 1984; Swanson and Swanson, 2019);the content of the article did not correspond with the scope of academic expatriation. For example, the term “foreign scientist” was used in the context of delivering patents and developing nanotechnology in Chinese companies (Appelbaum et al.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is necessary to engage several stakeholders, including international and guest professors, students, academic authorities, staff and the community. Swanson and Swanson (2019) highlighted the cultural competence among faculty to avoid miscommunication and dissatisfaction. Moreover, international students/faculty must actively participate and seek meaningful interactions to enhance their engagement (Wekullo, 2019).…”
Section: Dimension 6: Other Areas Of Internationalizationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While a few nations have explored different avenues for lessening these exchange costs by making exceptional stages, there are no European-wide help components. The European Union is engaged in helping collaboration between the member states to encourage versatility and improve the nature of affirmation frameworks (Swanson and Swanson, 2019).…”
Section: Entrance Test In Higher Educationmentioning
confidence: 99%