Faculty Representation on the Editorial Boards of Leading Marketing Journals: An Update of Marketing Department Rankings

Urbancic, Frank R.

doi:10.1080/10528008.2005.11488908

Cited by 12 publications

(11 citation statements)

References 14 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Some marketing scholars have provided rankings of marketing journals based on academics' perceptions of prestige (Hult et al 1997;Mort et al 2004;Theoharakis and Hirst 2002). Other academics have ranked marketing departments using editorial board memberships as the relevant metric (Kurtz and Boone 1988;Urbancic 2005). Bakir et al (2000) ranked marketing scholars and marketing departments as a function of publications (and fractional publications) in six leading marketing journals namely Journal of Marketing (JM), Journal of Consumer Research (JCR), Journal of Marketing Research (JMR), Marketing Science (MS), Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, and Journal of Retailing.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Applying the h-index in exploring bibliometric properties of elite marketing scholars

Saad

2009

Scientometrics

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The h-index is a recent metric that captures a scholar's influence. In the current work, it is used to: (1) obtain the h-index scores of the most productive scholars in the Journal of Consumer Research (JCR), and compare these to other elite scholars (including those of the other three premier marketing journals); (2) demonstrate the relationship between the h-indices and total number of citations of the top JCR producers; (3) examine the h-indices of Ferber winners (best interdisciplinary paper based on a doctoral dissertation published in JCR in a given year) and those having received honorable mentions; (4) explore the relationship between a marketing journal's prestige and the corresponding hindex score of its editor. These varied analyses demonstrate the multitudinous ways in which the h-index can be used when investigating bibliometric phenomena within a given discipline.

show abstract

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Applying the h-index in exploring bibliometric properties of elite marketing scholars

Saad

2009

Scientometrics

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Several researchers have examined the correlation between university ranking based on the number of editorial board members and the research output. Some studies found a positive correlation (Chan and Fok 2003;Frey and Rost 2010;Gibbons and Fish 1991;Kaufman 1984;Urbancic 2005), whereas others did not Burgess and Shaw 2010;Chan, Fung and Lai 2005). Hence, there is a lack of convergent results between the studies of various disciplines.…”

Section: The Relationship Between University Ranking Based On the Nummentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Using the number of editorial board members as an indicator of university ranking is expanding. In fact, an increasing number of sub-disciplines of economics and management, including marketing, international business, and tourism management have introduced university ranking based on number of editorial board members (Chan, Fung and Lai 2005;Frey and Rost 2010;Law, Leung and Buhalis 2010;Urbancic 2005;Urbancic 2011). However, similar studies on disciplines such as science, engineering, agriculture, and medicine remain relatively scarce ).…”

Section: The Relationship Between University Ranking Based On the Nummentioning

confidence: 99%

The relationship between SCI editorial board representation and university research output in the field of computer science: A quantile regression approach

Wang

2018

MJLIS

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This study uses the quantile regression models to explore the relationship between SCI (Science Citation Index) editorial board representation and research output of universities in the field of computer science. Quantile regression allows the investigation of the variation of the relationship between editorial board representation and research output. A total of 447 journals and 14,442 editorial board members were analysed. The results suggest that the number of editorial board members is positively and significantly related to the quantity (number of articles) and impact (total number of citations and citations per paper) of the research output from their respective universities. A deeper analysis using quantile regression, indicates that the relationship between the number of editorial board members and the research output is stronger when the university is at the higher quartile of the conditional research output distribution. In addition, to speculate on possible mechanisms behind the relationship between editorial board representation and research output, two exploratory studies based on two small samples were conducted at the individual and journal level, respectively.

show abstract

“…Several studies have examined the correlation between the number of editorial board members and scientific output of universities (Braun et al 2007a;Burgess and Shaw 2010;Chan and Fok 2003;Chan et al 2005;Gibbons and Fish 1991;Kaufman 1984;Urbancic 2005). The general purpose of these studies was to use the number of editorial board members as an evaluation indicator to measure the scientific output of universities.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

A Granger Causality Test of the Causal Relationship Between the Number of Editorial Board Members and the Scientific Output of Universities in the Field of Chemistry

Wang¹

2019

Current Science

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Editorial board members, who are considered the gatekeepers of scientific journals, play an important role in academia, and may directly or indirectly affect the scientific output of a university. In this article, we used the quantile regression method among a sample of 1,387 university in chemistry to characterize the correlation between the number of editorial board members and the scientific output of their universities. Furthermore, we used time-series data and the Granger causality test to explore the causal relationship between the number of editorial board members and the number of articles of some top universities. Our results suggest that the number of editorial board members is positively and significantly related to the scientific output (as measured by the number of articles, total number of citations, citations per paper, and h index) of their universities. However, the Granger causality test results suggest that the causal relationship between the number of editorial board members and the number of articles of some top universities is not obvious.Combining these findings with the results of qualitative interviews with editorial board members, we discuss the causal relationship between the number of editorial board members and the scientific output of their universities.

show abstract

Faculty Representation on the Editorial Boards of Leading Marketing Journals: An Update of Marketing Department Rankings

Cited by 12 publications

References 14 publications

Applying the h-index in exploring bibliometric properties of elite marketing scholars

Applying the h-index in exploring bibliometric properties of elite marketing scholars

The relationship between SCI editorial board representation and university research output in the field of computer science: A quantile regression approach

A Granger Causality Test of the Causal Relationship Between the Number of Editorial Board Members and the Scientific Output of Universities in the Field of Chemistry

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About