2015
DOI: 10.3109/10826084.2015.978617
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Failing Masculinity at the Club: A Poststructural Alternative to Intoxication Feminism

Abstract: With a starting point in women's studies, this article moves on to approach the nightclub as a place of embodiment for both genders by introducing neo-Lacanian insights combined with Baudrillardian concepts. We look at three young drug-experienced men interviewed for a Danish club study (2008-09). The article examines how the risks of losing masculinity, losing sexual opportunities, and losing friends are managed in nightlife. Since masculinity becomes invested in the fantasy of the drug and the utopian party,… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4
1
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Briggs and Ellis (2017) cite stag parties as a particularly apt example. Harder and Demant (2015) interviewed young men who frequented Danish nightclubs and used illegal drugs. Their participants reported that drugs such as cocaine, ecstasy and amphetamines enabled them to overcome shyness and anxiety, and gain the confidence to pick up women.…”
Section: Gender and The Night-time Economymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Briggs and Ellis (2017) cite stag parties as a particularly apt example. Harder and Demant (2015) interviewed young men who frequented Danish nightclubs and used illegal drugs. Their participants reported that drugs such as cocaine, ecstasy and amphetamines enabled them to overcome shyness and anxiety, and gain the confidence to pick up women.…”
Section: Gender and The Night-time Economymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some practices undertaken by men (e.g. displaying emotion) may, from the perspective of Connell (1995) and the Brannon Masculinity Scale (Brannon & Juni, 1984;David & Brannon, 1976), be interpreted as constituting a threat to dominant notions of masculinity, and in turn result in a loss of masculine status and self-esteem (Harder and Demant, 2015). However, this is not entirely adequate to fully understand or interpret how persons do masculinity.…”
Section: Theorizing Masculinity and Male Friendshipmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…What is interesting here, is the complete opposition to the 'No Sissy Stuff' (David and Brannon, 1976) masculinity typology, which both characters can be considered to have performed at different times throughout the show, due to the physicality of the interaction. Physical interactions between two or more heterosexual men have been cited in masculinity literature as boundary pushing in terms of performing a traditional masculine role unless it is enacted as an action which has been or will be expressed among or with women (Lupton, 2000), and can lead to outside questioning of the performers sexuality (Brook, 2015), or in some cases, lead to the exclusion of these men (Harder and Demant, 2015), so as not to challenge the hegemonic patriarchal status of the extant group.…”
Section: From Romance To Bromance -Performances Of Gender and Sexualitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…David and Brannon (1976) presented these themes in recognition of the role society encourages men to play-that is, men are required to perform a false front in order to "make it." Some practices undertaken by young men (e.g., caring, displaying emotion) may, from the perspective of Connell (1995) and David and Brannon (1976), be interpreted as constituting a threat to dominant notions of masculinity, and in turn result in a loss of masculine status and self-esteem (Harder and Demant 2015). However, this is not entirely adequate to fully understand/interpret the doings/performance of masculinity.…”
Section: Masculinitymentioning
confidence: 99%