2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.engfailanal.2013.07.037
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Failure analysis of RC shear walls with staggered openings under seismic loads

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
18
0
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 38 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
1
18
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The authors of this article departed from the general rules, due to which they got a much better resultthe strength of the building increased by 30%. Also in these articles [15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25], the authors conducted research on buildings at the construction stage or which were already subjected to an earthquake. This study allows to evaluate in advance, at the design stage of the building, the carrying capacity of the system in excess of the magnitude of the seismic loads of the design magnitude.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The authors of this article departed from the general rules, due to which they got a much better resultthe strength of the building increased by 30%. Also in these articles [15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25], the authors conducted research on buildings at the construction stage or which were already subjected to an earthquake. This study allows to evaluate in advance, at the design stage of the building, the carrying capacity of the system in excess of the magnitude of the seismic loads of the design magnitude.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They came to the conclusion that the value of seismic loads in regulations [4,5] is unreasonably underestimated. It should be noted that at current methods for assessing the seismic resistance of wall-frame buildings consider elastic-plastic behavior of building elements, taking into account the effect of the peak values of the seismic impact level [13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27][28][29]. The value of residual system deformation that takes place under the effect of peak values of seismic impact level is used for evaluation of seismic effect.…”
Section: Theoretical Overviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Three shear wall specimens SW1, SW4 and SW8 were tested by Mosoarca (2013) and simulated by numerical concrete damage plasticity (CDP) constitutive model using ABAQUS. In general, the experimental procedure consisted of five types of walls: three had staggered openings (SW23, SW45 and SW67), one with regular openings (SW8) and one without openings (SW1).…”
Section: Experimental Testingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this study, the evolution of the compressive and tensile damage parameters, d c and d t , respectively, which was defined by simplification in a linear damage parameter-strain relationship. The maximum value of these damage variables, d t and d c , is assumed to be 0.9, which represents the total degradation of the concrete material Mosoarca (Mosoarca 2013). For CDP model, perfectly plastic behavior is defined in terms of inelastic strain and yield stress.…”
Section: Definition Of Damage Evolutionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In 2014, Mosoarca compared the failure behavior of concrete shear walls with regular and irregular openings. The results revealed that for a similar configuration of reinforcing bars, walls with irregular openings, compared to walls with regular openings, are more stiff, and under compression exhibit more bearing strength capacity [7]. Bhowmick et al analytically studied the effect of circular openings on the behavior of single-story steel shear wall.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%