2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.treng.2020.100028
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Failure analysis of widened railway embankment with different reinforcing measures under heavy axle loads: A comparative FEM study

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The obtained values confirm the legitimacy of using a foamed concrete layer to strengthen the substrate, and thus reduce subgrade settlement, which is particularly important in the case of high-speed railways [ 102 , 103 , 104 , 105 , 106 ]. Moreover, this solution can be used as an alternative to other applied solutions to strengthen the substrate [ 15 , 107 , 108 ].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The obtained values confirm the legitimacy of using a foamed concrete layer to strengthen the substrate, and thus reduce subgrade settlement, which is particularly important in the case of high-speed railways [ 102 , 103 , 104 , 105 , 106 ]. Moreover, this solution can be used as an alternative to other applied solutions to strengthen the substrate [ 15 , 107 , 108 ].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[ 7 ]). At present, as thermal insulation or reinforcement materials in sub-ballast or sub-base layers can be used various polymer materials e.g., expanded polystyrene (EPS) [ 8 ], polyurethane [ 9 ], extruded polystyrene (styrodur) [ 10 , 11 , 12 ], artificial aggregates, liapor with foam glass [ 13 , 14 ], and geosynthetic materials (geogrids, geo-mattresses) [ 15 , 16 ]. The expanded polystyrene (EPS) in contact with subsoil is also used as isolation under (shallow) foundation [ 17 , 18 ] and under road pavement foundation [ 19 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The FEM generally produced the SF from the soil's shear strength properties, tan φ, and c with the shear strength steadily reduced up to the moment the soil is dissolved. Similarly, the interface strength is also decreased while the reduction in the strength parameters is controlled by the total coefficient as indicated in the following formula [23], [25]:…”
Section: Finite Element Methods (Fem)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Te dynamic train load demands the selection of an appropriate material model for numerical analysis that can better apprehend the stress-strain behavior of embankments and subsoil. Previous studies have used linear elastic models [16,19], Mohr-Coulomb models [14,16,[20][21][22][23][24][25], hardening soil (HS) models [14,26], modifed Cam-Clay models [24], and hardening soil models with small strain stifness (HS-small) [18]. Among these, the HS-small model can simulate soil stifness at very small strains and its nonlinear dependency on strain amplitude [27], which is crucial to consider for predicting soil behavior under dynamic train loads.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%