2017
DOI: 10.1038/srep41729
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Failure and recovery in dynamical networks

Abstract: Failure, damage spread and recovery crucially underlie many spatially embedded networked systems ranging from transportation structures to the human body. Here we study the interplay between spontaneous damage, induced failure and recovery in both embedded and non-embedded networks. In our model the network’s components follow three realistic processes that capture these features: (i) spontaneous failure of a component independent of the neighborhood (internal failure), (ii) failure induced by failed neighbori… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
65
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 56 publications
(66 citation statements)
references
References 59 publications
1
65
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Our findings provide an important example of the role played by dynamical correlations in cooperative processes on networked substrates, which is commonly not considered in other theoretical approaches. Pair-approximations as the one developed in this work can be used to improve the accuracy of phase diagrams observed in other related works [52,55] where first order mean-field theory captures the qualitative behavior but analytical spinoidals deviate from simulations when the average connectivity is reduced. Finally, we expect that our work will stimulate future analysis of dynamical correlations on other cooperative processes.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 87%
“…Our findings provide an important example of the role played by dynamical correlations in cooperative processes on networked substrates, which is commonly not considered in other theoretical approaches. Pair-approximations as the one developed in this work can be used to improve the accuracy of phase diagrams observed in other related works [52,55] where first order mean-field theory captures the qualitative behavior but analytical spinoidals deviate from simulations when the average connectivity is reduced. Finally, we expect that our work will stimulate future analysis of dynamical correlations on other cooperative processes.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 87%
“…This should allow to check against a simple oversight in the measurement of the global response ρ via eq. (11) and its interpretation through dynamical scaling.…”
Section: Response Functionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Examples include the Internet and World Wide Web, food webs, social networks, transportation systems, electricity distribution networks, genetic networks, brain networks and many others [1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11]. An important concern in the study of complex networks is their robustness, which is important for many fields, such as ecology, biology, economics and engineering [12][13][14][15][16][17][18]. Network robustness deals usually with the question of the response of the network to random failures and targeted attacks.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%