2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.nucengdes.2018.12.013
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Failure domain analysis and uncertainty quantification using surrogate models for steam explosion in a Nordic type BWR

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The jet speed can be derived through the debris mass flow rate ð _ M deb Þ, total breach area (A br Þ, and melt density (qÞ-which is currently assumed to take value equal to 8000 kg/m 3 (average corium density, based on Ref. [17])…”
Section: Postprocessing Of the Results Postprocessing Of Melcor Analmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…The jet speed can be derived through the debris mass flow rate ð _ M deb Þ, total breach area (A br Þ, and melt density (qÞ-which is currently assumed to take value equal to 8000 kg/m 3 (average corium density, based on Ref. [17])…”
Section: Postprocessing Of the Results Postprocessing Of Melcor Analmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ejected debris density is assumed to be equal to q ¼ 8000ðkg=m 3 Þ. This vale was assumed based on SERENA-II BWR benchmark exercise [17]. Debris ejection rate _ M deb is uniform during MELCOR plotting time-step DT P ðsÞ.…”
Section: Postprocessing Of the Results Postprocessing Of Melcor Analmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations