2013
DOI: 10.1080/0951192x.2013.785027
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Failure modes and effects analysis using integrated weight-based fuzzy TOPSIS

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
60
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 116 publications
(60 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
0
60
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, when the proposed approach is applied, the relative significances of FM 1 and FM 5 are different, i.e. 1 5 Q Q >   , and FM 1 has a higher risk than FM 5 . A similar situation can be found for the failure modes FM 3 , FM 7 and FM 9 .…”
Section: Comparative Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, when the proposed approach is applied, the relative significances of FM 1 and FM 5 are different, i.e. 1 5 Q Q >   , and FM 1 has a higher risk than FM 5 . A similar situation can be found for the failure modes FM 3 , FM 7 and FM 9 .…”
Section: Comparative Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The application steps of FMEA generally include: analyze the given process, product or service, list of all potential failure modes, evaluate their frequency, severity and detection, prioritize the identified failure modes, and develop corrective actions to eliminate or reduce the critical failure modes 1,3 . Nowadays, with its simplicity and visibility characteristics, FMEA has been widely applied in various areas, such as the aerospace, automotive, nuclear, and healthcare industries [4][5][6][7] .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Using entropy for determining weight is based on the idea that a criterion is more important if it creates a greater dissemination in the evaluations of the alternatives. The superiority of applying the entropy method for obtaining the weight of a criterion is that it avoids the subjectivity of DMs in determining the weight but includes the objective assessment instead, and it delivers an advantage when DMs conflict concerning the values of weights (Song, Minga, Wua, & Zhua, 2013). In this study, the objective weight is obtained by using the entropy method.…”
Section: Mhe Selection: the Criteria Literaturementioning
confidence: 98%
“…The final results are shown in Table 11. To demonstrate the effectiveness of the IF-TOPSISEF method for MADM problems, we compare the results of the example by analyzing the case with some similar computational approaches including the fuzzy TOPSIS model by Braglia1 et al (2003), the integrated weight-based fuzzy TOPSIS (IWF-TOPSIS) by Song et al (2013), the intuitionistic fuzzy hybrid TOPSIS (IFH-TOPSIS) approach by Liu et al (2015) and the risk priority number (RPN) method. The final ranking results are shown in Table 12.…”
Section: Tablementioning
confidence: 99%