2000
DOI: 10.1001/jama.284.2.210
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Failure of Routine HIV-1 Tests in a Case Involving Transmission With Preseroconversion Blood Components During the Infectious Window Period

Ai Ee Ling

Abstract: Transmission of HIV from a blood donor to a platelet recipient and a red blood cell recipient occurred in the preseroconversion infectious window period. The viral load in the implicated donation was estimated to be less than 40 copies/mL of plasma. Current US minipool HIV NAT screening protocols may not be sufficiently sensitive to detect all infectious window-period donations. JAMA. 2000;284:210-214

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
75
0
1

Year Published

2000
2000
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 93 publications
(77 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
1
75
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…NAT screening was implemented in the United States and other countries in 1999 using MP screening in which 16 or more donor specimens are pooled prior to testing (8,42). Prior to the use of MP-NAT, HIV was transmitted via window-stage donations at significant rates (5,22). Although very rarely, HIV has been transmitted by window period blood donations that were determined to have Յ150 vRNA copies/ml even after the adoption of MP-NAT (9,11,35,36).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…NAT screening was implemented in the United States and other countries in 1999 using MP screening in which 16 or more donor specimens are pooled prior to testing (8,42). Prior to the use of MP-NAT, HIV was transmitted via window-stage donations at significant rates (5,22). Although very rarely, HIV has been transmitted by window period blood donations that were determined to have Յ150 vRNA copies/ml even after the adoption of MP-NAT (9,11,35,36).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Long term seronegative yet infected state has been reported, especially once more sensitive methods for detecting the virus were developed (Imagawa et al 1989;Ensoli et al 1990;Gupta et al 1992). Incomplete detection of potentially infectious blood units (Ling et al 2000), and other donated organs (e.g. sperm, kidney, bone marrow) can transmit HIV infection to the recipients.…”
Section: Infection At the Seronegative Wp Is Infectiousmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In Singapore, it has been reported that a blood transfusion was the source of an HIV infection. The authors state that the blood donation and transfusion of blood components occurred in Singapore, where blood donation testing for HIV is similar to US protocols, including anti-HIV-1 and anti-HIV-2 EIAs and an HIV-1 p24 antigen EIA (Ling et al 2000). In another report two infections were caused by a blood donation in 2002 (Phelps et al 2004).…”
Section: Infectious Blood and Blood Products From Donors At The Seronmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1 Nucleic acid detection methods for HIV and hepatitis C (HCV) have reduced the window period for infectious risk, but may not eliminate transfusion-associated HIV 2 or HCV infections; 3 fatal bacterial infections caused by transfusion of platelet concentrates continue to be reported. 4 To improve the safety of platelet and plasma transfusion, a nucleic acid-targeted photochemical treatment (PCT) using the psoralen compound amotosalen HCl (S-59) and longwavelength ultraviolet A (UVA) light was developed to inactivate viruses, bacteria, and protozoa that may contaminate platelet and plasma components.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%