1976
DOI: 10.1136/hrt.38.1.85
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Failure of ST segment elevation to predict severity of acute myocardial infarction.

Abstract: Praecordial ST segment elevation was measured at 35 electrode positions in each of 40 patients admitted to a coronary care unit after acute transmural anterior myocardial infarction. Serial praecordial electrocardiographic maps were recorded to determine (a) the time course as well as reproducibility of measurements of ST segment alterations, and (b) the degree of correlation between the magnitude of ST segment elevation and the severity of infarction, as assessed clinically or by sequential estimations of se… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
20
1
1

Year Published

1976
1976
1996
1996

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 78 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
2
20
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…LV ischemic sites were further subdivided into those overlying apical (1) and more basally (2) located portions of the ischemic region by a line (vertical dashed line) drawn from the site of the small artery occlusion to the apex of the heart. Nonischemic sites (7,8,9,10) were labeled as either "near" (7,9) for those within 2.0 cm of the boundary (curved dashed line) or "distant" (8,10) for those located further away. The position of the large artery occlusion is also illustrated.…”
Section: Experiments In the Intact Heartmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…LV ischemic sites were further subdivided into those overlying apical (1) and more basally (2) located portions of the ischemic region by a line (vertical dashed line) drawn from the site of the small artery occlusion to the apex of the heart. Nonischemic sites (7,8,9,10) were labeled as either "near" (7,9) for those within 2.0 cm of the boundary (curved dashed line) or "distant" (8,10) for those located further away. The position of the large artery occlusion is also illustrated.…”
Section: Experiments In the Intact Heartmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Controversy has arisen recently, however, for despite all the time, effort, and resources invested in TQ-ST segment mapping studies, basic appreciation of the complex manner by which the TQ-ST segment deflection relates to the underlying ischemic region has been lacking. Inevitably, confusion and disagreement over the specificity and quantitative value of this electrocardiographic measure of myocardial injury was to be expected (3)(4)(5)(6)(7)(8)(9)(10)(11). Recognizing the current renewed interest in this area and the profound clinical value of being able to quantify ischemic damage, we have in this study examined in a theoretical and experimental manner some basic spatial and nonspatial factors influencing the magnitude and polarity of TQ-ST deflection during myocardial ischemia.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although somewhat higher correlation coefficients (r = -0.36 vs. r = -0.51) were obtained when the values for ST-segment elevation measured at 20 ms after the end of QRS were used, the relationship demonstrated was nevertheless of little value for a quantitative prediction of the degree of tissue damage for a given level of ST-segment deviation. The limitations of ST-segment elevation as a predictive index is also emphasized by studies in patients with acute myocardial infarction in whom no significant correlation was found between the summated peak precordial ST-segment elevation and ultimate infarct size calculated from the fractional disappearance curves of serum CPK activity (31).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1) How does the normal variability of the course ofprecordial ST-segment elevation during acute myocardial infarction affect the method? Large, rapid fluctuations in ST segment may occur in the course of infarction in individual patients without obvious cause97, 98 and in a group of patients there is a progressive fall in the average ST-segment elevation as a function of time. The occurrence of these spontaneous changes in MST precludes generalization from changes of ST-segment elevation in a single patient.…”
Section: Precordial St-segment Mappingmentioning
confidence: 99%