2004
DOI: 10.1016/j.compscitech.2003.06.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Failure phenomena in fibre-reinforced composites. Part 6: a finite element study of stress concentrations in unidirectional carbon fibre-reinforced epoxy composites

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
33
1

Year Published

2008
2008
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 53 publications
(38 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
4
33
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In this study, the magnitude of the calculated SCF value obtained at room temperature (Table 3) is higher than those reported in other studies [8,[21][22][23] where matrix elasto-plasticity was included in the models. This can be explained by the redistribution of the overload from a broken fibre among a larger number of intact neighbouring fibres in those studies.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 51%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…In this study, the magnitude of the calculated SCF value obtained at room temperature (Table 3) is higher than those reported in other studies [8,[21][22][23] where matrix elasto-plasticity was included in the models. This can be explained by the redistribution of the overload from a broken fibre among a larger number of intact neighbouring fibres in those studies.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 51%
“…The elasto-plasticity of the matrix has been incorporated into finite element models by other authors [21,22] and led to a significantly lower strain concentration factor in comparison to the elastic case. In contrast, it has been shown elsewhere [23] that matrix plasticity resulted in a slight decrease in the SCF and it was concluded that the SCF was mainly affected by the number of surrounding fibres.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 59%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, due to the strong stress-transfer effect of the interface and matrix with no interface debonding, the further distance away from the fiber break, the better is the load-bearing capacity of the broken fiber. [13] L. Sun, Y. Jia, F. Ma, J. Zhao, C. C. Han Figure 6. Final fracture process of a multi-fiber model composite with weak interface (the surface of the fiber is urethane-sized) at strains: a) 5.6, b) 7.0, c) 7.3%, and d) fracture.…”
Section: Stress Recovery Of the Broken Fiber Along Fiber Axismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Microdamage analysis of fibrous composites has received considerable attention in recent years. [5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20] Herrera-Franco et al studied radial stresses at the interface during the fiber pulled out from the droplet using FEA analysis. [5] Sirivedin et al derived an analytical expression to estimate the…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%