2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.ins.2009.12.022
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Failure prediction of dotcom companies using neural network–genetic programming hybrids

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
24
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 54 publications
(28 citation statements)
references
References 50 publications
0
24
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The significance of CFFOTA and CFFOCL provides support for this postulate. Furthermore, CFFOTA, which has been reported significant in several other studies in different contexts (Shumway, 2001, Bose, 2006, Ravisankar et al, 2010 had by far the largest estimated effect. CFFOCL, also reported significant by Gilbert et al (1990), had the second largest effect.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 64%
“…The significance of CFFOTA and CFFOCL provides support for this postulate. Furthermore, CFFOTA, which has been reported significant in several other studies in different contexts (Shumway, 2001, Bose, 2006, Ravisankar et al, 2010 had by far the largest estimated effect. CFFOCL, also reported significant by Gilbert et al (1990), had the second largest effect.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 64%
“…The target variable can be continuous (typically a general prediction problem and usually approached by a type of regression model) or categorical (classification problem). The most widely used methods belonging to this group include decision trees [29], neural networks [19] and support vector machines [26].…”
Section: Machine Learning In Financial Risk Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While in case of the problem of crisis prediction, a class variable is usually present, unsupervised learning methods can still offer an important tool, with the most frequently used methods belonging to this group include selforganizing maps [23] and c-means clustering [12] In a recent and literature review, a complete picture of the application of machine learning in financial crisis prediction was given by Lin et al [11]. Additionally to the above mentioned two groups, they found statistics-based learning methods, for example logistic regression [24] or discriminant analysis [18], and other methods, such as genetic algorithms [19], as widely used in the crisis prediction literature.…”
Section: Machine Learning In Financial Risk Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Another problem refers to the fact that several works employ this parametric test to compare multiple algorithms (e.g. Ravisankar et al 2010;Tsai and Wu 2008;Ribeiro et al 2012), even though not being suitable to carry out this type of comparisons.…”
Section: Statistical Tests Of Significancementioning
confidence: 99%