Failure to detect displacement of the visual world during saccadic eye movements

Bridgeman, Bruce; Hendry, Derek P.; Stark, Lawrence

doi:10.1016/0042-6989(75)90290-4

Cited by 807 publications

(435 citation statements)

References 16 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

407

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…Thus, the displacement must rather be detected by comparing the pre-saccadic with the post-saccadic stimulus location. Unlike during fixation, a small displacement of a target stimulus during a saccade is often not noticed after the eye movement [29,30]. In such experiments, a target stimulus that is initially fixated jumps to a new location, and subjects have to follow the jump with a saccade.…”

Section: Perceptual and Physiological Phenomena Before And During Sacmentioning

confidence: 99%

Computational models of spatial updating in peri-saccadic perception

Hamker

Zirnsak

Ziesche

et al. 2011

Phil. Trans. R. Soc. B

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Perceptual phenomena that occur around the time of a saccade, such as peri-saccadic mislocalization or saccadic suppression of displacement, have often been linked to mechanisms of spatial stability. These phenomena are usually regarded as errors in processes of trans-saccadic spatial transformations and they provide important tools to study these processes. However, a true understanding of the underlying brain processes that participate in the preparation for a saccade and in the transfer of information across it requires a closer, more quantitative approach that links different perceptual phenomena with each other and with the functional requirements of ensuring spatial stability. We review a number of computational models of peri-saccadic spatial perception that provide steps in that direction. Although most models are concerned with only specific phenomena, some generalization and interconnection between them can be obtained from a comparison. Our analysis shows how different perceptual effects can coherently be brought together and linked back to neuronal mechanisms on the way to explaining vision across saccades.

show abstract

Section: Perceptual and Physiological Phenomena Before And During Sacmentioning

confidence: 99%

Computational models of spatial updating in peri-saccadic perception

Hamker

Zirnsak

Ziesche

et al. 2011

Phil. Trans. R. Soc. B

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…We are not suggesting that the model is a substitute for the detailed pictorial information contained in the visual input itself, but rather that it acts as the reference frame to which gaze changes are indexed. It is true that the resolution of the egocentric model is low, but then so is our ability to detect displacements during a saccade [6]. The indexing only has to be good enough to paper over the cracks.…”

Section: Stability Of the Visual World Revisitedmentioning

confidence: 99%

Vision and the representation of the surroundings in spatial memory

Tatler

Land

2011

Phil. Trans. R. Soc. B

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

One of the paradoxes of vision is that the world as it appears to us and the image on the retina at any moment are not much like each other. The visual world seems to be extensive and continuous across time. However, the manner in which we sample the visual environment is neither extensive nor continuous. How does the brain reconcile these differences? Here, we consider existing evidence from both static and dynamic viewing paradigms together with the logical requirements of any representational scheme that would be able to support active behaviour. While static scene viewing paradigms favour extensive, but perhaps abstracted, memory representations, dynamic settings suggest sparser and task-selective representation. We suggest that in dynamic settings where movement within extended environments is required to complete a task, the combination of visual input, egocentric and allocentric representations work together to allow efficient behaviour. The egocentric model serves as a coding scheme in which actions can be planned, but also offers a potential means of providing the perceptual stability that we experience.

show abstract

“…Due to the high retinal velocity during a saccade, however, these signals are basically 'wiped-out' with each eye movement. This leads to a strong reduction in sensitivity (by three to four log units) for detecting displacements during saccades (Bridgeman et al, 1975). Magnocellular pathways are also implicated in saccadic suppression of displacement (Bridgeman and Macknik, 1995).…”

Section: Saccadic Suppressionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Transsaccadic memory of position and form

Deubel

Schneider

Bridgeman

2002

The Brain's Eye: Neurobiological and Clinical Aspects of Oculomotor Research

Self Cite

100

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Why and how people perceive the visual world as continuous and stable, despite the gross changes of its retinal projection that occur with each saccade, is one of the classic problems in perception. In the present paper, we argue that an important factor of visual stability and transsaccadic perception is formed by the reafferent visual information, i.e., the visual display that is present when the eyes land. After a review of some of the relevant theoretical, behavioural and physiological research on space constancy, saccadic suppression and transsaccadic memory, three experiments are presented. In a first experiment, we study the effect of an extended horizontal bar covering the target area for a short period after the saccade on saccadic suppression of image displacement. The results show that the bar acts just like a temporary blanking of the saccade target, leading to a strong reduction of saccadic suppression. In the second experiment, we show that any object that is present immediately after the saccade can establish a spatial reference, even if it is dissimilar to the saccade target. In a third experiment we study, with a similar approach, the effect of blanking and postsaccadic information on transsaccadic integration of form information. The data demonstrate that a localized postsaccadic object tends to replace the content of transsaccadic memory.

show abstract

Failure to detect displacement of the visual world during saccadic eye movements

Cited by 807 publications

References 16 publications

Computational models of spatial updating in peri-saccadic perception

Computational models of spatial updating in peri-saccadic perception

Vision and the representation of the surroundings in spatial memory

Transsaccadic memory of position and form

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About