No abstract

Displacement of a visual target during a saccadic eye movement is normally detected only at a high threshold, implying that high-quality information about target position is not stored in the nervous system across the saccade. We show that blanking the target for 50-300 msec after a saccade restores sensitivity to the displacement. With blanking, subjects reliably detect displacements as small as 0.33 deg across 6 deg eye movements, with correspondingly steep psychophysical functions. Performance with blanking in a fixation control is inferior, evidence for a saccadic enhancement of sensitivity to image displacement. If blanking is delayed so that the target is visible immediately after the saccade in its displaced position, performance declines to non-blanking levels. Blanking the target before the saccade, and restoring it during the saccade, yields a similar but weaker effect. We interpret these results with a model in which the visual system searches for the postsaccadic goal target within a restricted spatiotemporal window. If it is not found, the assumption of stationarity of the world is broken and the system makes use of other information such as extraretinal signals for calibrating location.

Studies of saccadic suppression and induced motion have suggested separate representations of visual space for perception and visually guided behavior. Because these methods required stimulus motion, subjects might have confounded motion and position. We separated cognitive and sensorimotor maps without motion of target, background, or eye, with an "induced Roelofs effect": a target inside an off-center frame appears biased opposite the direction of the frame. A frame displayed to the left of a subject's center line, for example, will make a target inside the frame appear farther to the right than its actual position. The effect always influences perception, but in half of our subjects it did not influence pointing. Cognitive and sensorimotor maps interacted when the motor response was delayed; all subjects now showed a Roelofs effect for pointing, suggesting that the motor system was being fed from the biased cognitive map. A second experiment showed similar results when subjects made an open-ended cognitive response instead of a five-alternative forced choice. Experiment 3 showed that the results were not due to shifts in subjects' perception of the felt straight-ahead position. In Experiment 4, subjects pointed to the target and judged its location on the same trial. Both measures showed a Roelofs effect, indicating that each trial was treated as a single event and that the cognitive representation was accessed to localize this event in both response modes.Several topographic maps represent the visual world in the cortex (Felleman & Van Essen, 1991). This characteristic of the visual system raises a question for visual physiology: do all of these maps work together to create a single representation of visual space, or are they functionally distinct? If they are distinct, how many functional maps are there and how do they communicate with one another? This paper presents psychophysical evidence for at least two functionally distinct representations of the visual world in normal humans; under some conditions, the two representations can simultaneously hold different spatial values. The paper also demonstrates some of the ways in which the representations communicate with one another.An early hint that cognitive and sensorimotor systems are separable in normal humans came from studies of eye movements. On the one hand, subjects are unaware ofsizable displacements of the visual world if they occur during saccadic eye movements, implying that information about spatial location is degraded during saccades (Bridgeman,

We recently demonstrated that the perceived stability of a visual target that is displaced during a saccade critically depends on whether the target is present immediately when the saccade ends; blanking a target during and just after a saccade makes its intra-saccadic displacement more visible (Deubel et al. Vis Res 1996;36:985-996). Here, we investigate the interaction of visual context and blanking. Subjects saw a saccade target and an equal-sized distractor. During a saccade one or the other was displaced left or right. At the same time, one of the objects could be blanked briefly. Subjects reported whether the target or the distractor had jumped. The object that was blanked was more often seen as jumping (Experiment 1), regardless of which object really jumped, implying that continuously visible objects are preferentially perceived as stable. When both objects were blanked, longer blanking led to better accuracy at identifying which had jumped during a saccade. When one object was jumped and the other, stationary object was blanked (Experiment 2), the blanked object was mistakenly seen as jumping until the jump covered 50% or more of the saccade amplitude. In Experiment 3 a large continuously present texture underwent an undetected jump during a saccade, biasing judgments of simultaneous jumps of a blanked target. The results demonstrate that space constancy in normal situations is dominated by the assumption that a continuously present pattern is stable--this pattern becomes the spatial reference for the post-saccadic recalibration of perceptual space.

No abstract