1967
DOI: 10.1037/h0024514
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Failure to escape traumatic shock.

Abstract: Dogs which had 1st learned to panel press in a harness in order to escape shock subsequently showed normal acquisition of escape/ avoidance behavior in a shuttle box. In contrast, yoked, inescapable shock in the harness produced profound interference with subsequent escape responding in the shuttle box. Initial experience with escape in the shuttle box led to enhanced panel pressing during inescapable shock in the harness and prevented interference with later responding in the shuttle box. Inescapable shock in… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

18
764
4
82

Year Published

1975
1975
2008
2008

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1,607 publications
(868 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
18
764
4
82
Order By: Relevance
“…The subjects did not learn to escape or avoid after the initial classical conditioning, an unpredicted finding. Of course, the shock during classical conditioning was inescapable, and Seligman and Maier [40] attempted to determine whether this aspect of the initial classical conditioning was resposible for producing the later failure to learn, and it was. This 1967 study, along with a report that control reduced the impact of the stressor on ulcer formation [49] began the study of stressor controllability.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The subjects did not learn to escape or avoid after the initial classical conditioning, an unpredicted finding. Of course, the shock during classical conditioning was inescapable, and Seligman and Maier [40] attempted to determine whether this aspect of the initial classical conditioning was resposible for producing the later failure to learn, and it was. This 1967 study, along with a report that control reduced the impact of the stressor on ulcer formation [49] began the study of stressor controllability.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One possibility is to study the USPEE in active avoidance learning, in which previous exposures to inescapable shock (US pre-exposures) interfere with subsequent avoidance learning. This effect, sometimes also referred to as learned helplessness (within the context of aversive instrumental learning), can readily take place even when pre-exposures to inescapable shock and avoidance learning were conducted in separate apparatus (Seligman and Maier, 1967;Seligman et al, 1975). Thus, if amphetamine can interfere with the USPEE within avoidance learning, it will provide further support to the drug's effect on the USPEE that is beyond its known effect on Kamin blocking.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This model developed from a series of experiments conducted by Overmier, Seligman and Maier in the mid-1960s (Overmier and Seligman, 1967;Seligman and Maier, 1967). In the experiments, animals were exposed to aversive shocks or other stressors and tested later on their ability to learn a new task in which escape from a mild footshock was possible.…”
Section: Helplessness Behavior In the Female Ratmentioning
confidence: 99%