Failures in the rehabilitation treatment with removable partial dentures

Benso, Bruna; Kovalik, Ana Cristina; Jorge, Janaína Habib; Campanha, Nara Hellen

doi:10.3109/00016357.2013.777780

Cited by 43 publications

(52 citation statements)

References 37 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…The success rate of RDPs depends on the indication for the RDP, the design of the RDP and an appropriate follow-up for the patient (4)(5)(6). A great number of studies have examined the survival rates and complications incurred using RDPs, and different outcomes have been reported (4,6,7). Thus, survival rates for RDPs of approximately 75% after 5 years and 50-60% after 10 years have been described (7)(8)(9).…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Oral health‐related quality of life and complications after treatment with partial removable dental prosthesis

Al-Imam

Özhayat

Benetti

et al. 2015

J of Oral Rehabilitation

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The aims of this study were to measure and describe the oral health-related quality of life (OHRQoL) and to identify the complications caused by partial removable dental prosthesis (RDPs) in patients 1-5 years after treatment. Complications were identified in 65 patients who were treated with 83 RDPs (48 upper, 35 lower). OHRQoL was measured using the OHIP-49 before treatment and at the baseline (1-2 months after treatment) and follow-up (1-5 years after treatment) examinations. The types and numbers of oral problems that were experienced were described based on OHIP items with a score of 3 and 4. A significant improvement (P < 0·05) in the total OHIP-49 was registered from pre-treatment (mean 42, SD ± 37) to baseline (mean 29, SD ± 27) and from pre-treatment to 1-5 years after treatment (mean 32, SD ± 30). There was no significant difference between the baseline and 1- to 5-year follow-up examinations. Problems with eating and appearance registered at pre-treatment were improved at baseline and after 1-5 years. Problems with dentures that had been registered pre-treatment were improved at baseline but reoccurred after 1-5 years. The two most frequent complications were ill-fitting RDPs and inflammation of the oral mucosa, followed less frequently by fractures of the clasps. Treatment with RDPs improved OHRQoL, but denture-related problems partly remained, and new problems related to RDPs occurred 1-5 years after treatment. The two most frequent complications were ill-fitting RDPs and inflammation of the oral mucosa.

show abstract

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Oral health‐related quality of life and complications after treatment with partial removable dental prosthesis

Al-Imam

Özhayat

Benetti

et al. 2015

J of Oral Rehabilitation

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…[4][5][6] However, problems related to cobalt-chromium (CoCr) alloys traditionally used for RPD construction have been documented. [6][7][8][9] Advances in polymer-based materials and digital fabrication strategies might allow for incorporation of key design features such as rests and indirect and direct retention components. The increased biocompatibility, durability, and elasticity, as well as the more esthetically pleasing and costeffective benefits, will expand their applications in RPD-based prosthetics.…”

mentioning

confidence: 99%

CAD/CAM Constructed Poly(etheretherketone) (PEEK) Framework of Kennedy Class I Removable Partial Denture: A Clinical Report

Harb

Abdel-Khalek

Hegazy

2018

Journal of Prosthodontics

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The prevalence of partially edentulous adults that could be treated by removable partial dentures (RPDs) is estimated to be greater than 20% in some regions of the United States. Problems related to traditional materials for RPD construction have been documented. Advances in polymer‐based materials and digital fabrication strategies would allow increased biocompatibility, durability, and elasticity, as well as more esthetically pleasing and cost‐effective benefits. This article reports on poly(etheretherketone) RPD framework produced by digital and milling technology.

show abstract

“…Besides, they did not consider the stage of RPD adaptation in subsequent checkups, a factor that could be relevant in the study of MP. 11 On the other hand, Asakawa et al 12 reported measures performed with the "sieving test", in which patients with new and adapted prostheses showed an increase in masticatory efficiency after a few weeks. However, they recommend that other tests measuring MP should be performed to complement their findings.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Influence of adaptation of removable partial denture on masticatory performance.

2016

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Abstract:Objective: To compare the masticatory performance (MP) of patients with old removable partial denture (RPD), recently inserted RPD and already adapted RPD by means of the simple sieve test. Material and Methods: Twenty-nine adult (>18 years old) volunteer patients were recruited, with lower and upper RPD, excluding total edentulous subjects in the upper and lower jaw, with temporomandibular disorders, severe periodontal disease, mental disability or systemic disease compromising the masticatory or nervous system. Dentures were designed and fabricated by an expert operator. MP was evaluated in old RPD (MP1), recently inserted RPD (MP2) and adapted RPD (MP3). The simple sieve test used was Edlund-Lamm in percentage of MP, using Optosil® Comfort condensation silicone tablets, with standard sizes (5.0x20mm). In each phase, the patient chewed the tablet with 20 masticatory strokes. The crushed fragments were dried at 80°C for 60 minutes and weighed on an analytical scale. A multiple vibration sieve analysis was performed, using sieves with opening sizes of 2.8mm and 1.4mm. Shapiro-Wilk test and Anova test with Bonferroni correction were performed. Results: It was observed that MP1 presented a mean of 8.40% (SD±5.59), MP2 a mean of 8.56% (SD±5.56), and MP3 a mean of 18.26% (SD±8.12). There was a significant difference (p<0.05) between the MP1-MP3 groups, as well as between the MP2-MP3 (p<0.05). Conclusion: There is a significant increase in MP thirty days after the insertion of RPD, checkups, and adjustments performed by the dentist.

show abstract

Failures in the rehabilitation treatment with removable partial dentures

Abstract: This study describes factors that lead to failures and complications in oral rehabilitation through the use of RPDs and suggests possible solutions.

Cited by 43 publications

References 37 publications

Oral health‐related quality of life and complications after treatment with partial removable dental prosthesis

Oral health‐related quality of life and complications after treatment with partial removable dental prosthesis

CAD/CAM Constructed Poly(etheretherketone) (PEEK) Framework of Kennedy Class I Removable Partial Denture: A Clinical Report

Influence of adaptation of removable partial denture on masticatory performance.

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About