Fairness and the Politics of Resentment

Abstract

The role of the emotions in the framing of welfare policies is still relatively underexplored. This article examines the role of resentment in the construction of a particular form of ‘anti-welfare populism’ advanced by the Coalition Government in the UK after 2010. We argue that UK political parties have appropriated the discourse of fairness to promote fundamentally divisive policies which have been popular with large sections of the electorate including, paradoxically, many poorer voters. In focus group research in white working class communities in the UK undertaken just before the 2010 General Election, resentments related to perceived unfairness and loss emerged as very strong themes among our respondents. We examine such resentments in terms of an underlying ‘structure of feeling’ which fuels the reactionary populism seen in ‘anti-welfare’ discourses. These promote increasingly conditional and punitive forms of welfare in countries experiencing austerity, such as the UK, creating rivalries rather than building solidarities amongst those who ‘have little’ and drawing attention away from greater inequalities.

Complying, Transforming or Resisting in the New Austerity? Realigning Social Welfare and Independent Action among English Voluntary Organisations

“…Equally, the spread of marketisation has distorted service goals and approaches through imposing contract criteria and performance targets (Milbourne and Cushman, 2013). However, the recent scaling-up of contracts and intensification of competition, justified as a means to deliver more efficient and effective services, has constructed a fundamental realignment of publicly funded activities and ideas about welfare purposes and beneficiaries (Hoggett et al, 2013). Miller and Rose (1990: 3-4) examine the expansion of governed spaces achieved through policy (and associated cultures of arrangements), applying Foucault's concept of governmentality.…”

The discordant pleasures of everyday eating: Reflections on the social gradient in obesity under neo-liberalism

“…We saw several instances where the failure to accomplish control over eating impelled further acts of eating as responses to this frustration. In a different context, Hoggett et al (2013) draw on Nietzsche's notion of ressentiment, a "form of resentment associated with passivity and either lack of agency or destructive agency" (2013: 577), or a sense of hostility which is directed at that which is seen as the cause of one's frustration -in this case, the self. In previous work exploring understandings of inequality we describe a discourse we called 'no legitimate dependency', something angry and unsettling, where dependence on others is disavowed, and where the self is deemed responsible for all, setting up impossible standards to attain (Peacock et al, 2014).…”

Shape-shifter and Agenda Setter: The Influence of Emotion in Social Work Practice and Practice Education

“…Partly emanating from initial feelings associated with threats to professional status and professional identity, these emotions were seen to be expressed through 'irony, critique and ignoring of competences ' (2008, p. 203). Once again, the significance of the social and relational context within which emotion manifests is on stark display and we see to the emergence of power and resentment as forces that can propel and twist emotional responses; both intimately associated with wider political systems which too exert influence on the production and expression of emotions in others (see Hoggett, Wilkinson & Beedell, 2013;Warner, 2014;Warner, 2015), at times replicating and reinforcing limited understandings, funnelling emotional expression by virtue of hegemonic authority.…”

“…Where and who is the puppeteer who choreographs this milieu? At this interval it is prudent to give greater attention to notions of risk, a phenomena that has become a societal preoccupation (Dore, 2006), one which has served to reconfigure social work (Webb, 2006), and which now acts as a conduit for social demarcation (see Hoggett et al, 2013). The process of 'Othering' describes the means by which social ordering takes place, based on the identification of 'Others' that are considered threatening (see Hoggett et al, 2013;Lupton, 2013;Warner, 2015).…”