“Fairness” in an unequal society: Welfare workers, labor inspectors and the embedded moralities of street‐level bureaucracy in Argentina

Abstract

This article advances a new argument on street-level bureaucrats' (SLBs) moral dilemmas in developing countries. Developing countries feature deeper and more pervasive social and economic inequalities than their developed counterparts. They also feature what I call a fragmented stateness: states whose legal and bureaucratic reach is functional and territorially unequal and that also have an ambiguous relationship with their own legality. This macro-level force shapes daily bureaucratic encounters and SLBs' moral dilemmas and practices in ways that the literature has not fully grasped. I found that the awareness of this fragmented stateness implies a kind of structural experience of arbitrariness in bureaucratic encounters that makes the exercise of fair judgments in the implementation of policies elusive. I ground my argument in an ethnographic account of bureaucratic encounters in different arenas of the Argentinean social protection system: welfare provision and labor inspection.By reconstructing the connections between fragmented stateness and state workers' moral dilemmas, this article presents a novel and empirically grounded theoretical argument on an often-overlooked dimension of collective regulation of conflicts and judgments at the state frontlines.

“Nobody wants to be a dead hero”: Coping with precarity at the frontlines of the Brazilian and Mexican pandemic response

“…Moreover, considering that behavioral responses affect wellbeing (Salehi et al., 2023), we can expect that, in extreme cases as those analyzed here, the self‐preservation response emerges as a survival strategy. This conclusion helps explain why studies in non‐Western countries often find that street‐level bureaucrats simultaneously exclude clients (Eiró, 2019; Perelmiter, 2021; Spink et al., 2021) and try to bridge significant public service gaps (Masood & Nisar, 2021; Mohammed, 2021). In other words, whether frontline workers operate as citizen agents or state agents may be mediated by concerns for self‐preservation.…”

Street-level bureaucracy in weak state institutions: a systematic review of the literature

“…First, informal privatization is associated with resource scarcity in combination with accountability gaps and uncontrolled street-level discretion, and, to a lesser extent, with precarious labor conditions such as low pay, with political-clientelist motives, or with citizen-initiated manipulation attempts. According to Perelmiter (2021), a patchy and selective legal and bureaucratic apparatus leads to a structural experience of arbitrariness in bureaucratic encounters. However, the boundaries between predatory bureaucracy (moving against citizens) and policy improvisation (moving towards citizens) are sometimes blurry.…”

Mediaciones sociales y burocráticas en la era digital. La política social argentina en tiempos de pandemia

“…Sobre las prácticas de burocracias de calle asociadas a la certificación de las condicionalidades en la Argentina de la principal política de ingresos para las infancias (la asignación universal por hijo), véaseRizzo (2020). Sobre las moralidades de burócratas del bienestar en la Argentina, véasePerelmiter (2022). 4 La literatura sobre intermediación política es muy amplia en la región.…”