2005
DOI: 10.1259/bjr/55015850
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

False negative 16 detector multislice CT for scaphoid fracture

Abstract: We discuss a case of a 19-year-old man with scaphoid trauma. We describe the imaging findings on three sets of radiographs, bone scintigraphy, CT and MRI. CT failed to identify a scaphoid fracture, which was present on 6 week radiographs, MRI and scintigraphy. The case illustrates that despite multidetector technology, CT still relies upon cortical and or trabecular displacement to demonstrate fractures.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, MRI is relatively expensive and not readily available acutely for outpatients in the National Health Service of the UK (Hansen et al, 2009). Multidetector CT relies on cortical and/or trabecular displacement to identify fractures and can produce false negative and positive results acutely (Beeres et al, 2008;Groves et al, 2005). Compared with MRI, it is superior for identifying occult cortical scaphoid fractures, but inferior for detecting solely trabecular injury (Memarsadeghi et al, 2006).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, MRI is relatively expensive and not readily available acutely for outpatients in the National Health Service of the UK (Hansen et al, 2009). Multidetector CT relies on cortical and/or trabecular displacement to identify fractures and can produce false negative and positive results acutely (Beeres et al, 2008;Groves et al, 2005). Compared with MRI, it is superior for identifying occult cortical scaphoid fractures, but inferior for detecting solely trabecular injury (Memarsadeghi et al, 2006).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, diagnosis of fracture on CT relies on the presence of cortical or trabecula Figure 3 PA radiographs of the wrist taken in (a) neutral and (b) ulna deviation. On ulna deviation the scaphoid 'extends' so that it's long axis lies perpendicular to the X-ray beam, thus appearing longer displacement at the site of injury and when no displacement is present CT can fail to identify injury which can be seen on MRI and bone scan (Groves et al, 2005b;Temple et al, 2005).…”
Section: Diagnosismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…26 However, Groves and his team have demonstrated in a number of cases the inability of CT to identify a scaphoid fracture which was captured by MRI, bone scintigraphy and even radiographs. 27,28 This was attributed to the fact that CT relies upon cortical or trabecular displacement at the fracture site. It was also postulated that these discordant fractures may represent injuries such as bone bruising, which was seen on approximately one-third of all MRI scans covered in our audits.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%