2005
DOI: 10.21829/fb.109.2005.139
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Familia Hydrophyllaceae

Abstract: Familia de unos 18 (20) géneros y unas 250 (300) especies, de distribución casi cosmopolita pero de manera preferente en las regiones templadas y tropicales del Hemisferio Norte. Algunos representantes de géneros como Nemophila, Phacelia y otros se cultivan como ornamentales. En la región de esta Flora se han encontrado cuatro géneros y 15 especies.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0
3

Year Published

2023
2023
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
2
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…In Table 1, we show the differences between N. asuncionesis, N. hispida sensu lato, N. origanifolia from northern Mexico based on descriptions in Hitchcock (1933a, b), Hickman (1993), Pérez Calix & Carranza-González (2005), Shreve & Wiggins (1964), and N. demissa, due to the closeness suggested in the Taylor (2012) As shown in the Table 1, the differentiation between N. asuncionensis and these other taxa is expressed mainly on geographic and habitat criteria, the presence of tiny, rather inconspicuous, capitate glandular trichomes beneath the more obvious non-glandular hairs, the small size of the corolla, the larger seeds, and the compact cushion-like growth form, or pulvinatiform. Some other traits shared with some taxa are the tricolored corolla and the infolded/revolute condition of the leaf margin to some degree, but in N. asuncionensis, this last character is extreme as it is not possible to lift and open the foliar blade without ripping it.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In Table 1, we show the differences between N. asuncionesis, N. hispida sensu lato, N. origanifolia from northern Mexico based on descriptions in Hitchcock (1933a, b), Hickman (1993), Pérez Calix & Carranza-González (2005), Shreve & Wiggins (1964), and N. demissa, due to the closeness suggested in the Taylor (2012) As shown in the Table 1, the differentiation between N. asuncionensis and these other taxa is expressed mainly on geographic and habitat criteria, the presence of tiny, rather inconspicuous, capitate glandular trichomes beneath the more obvious non-glandular hairs, the small size of the corolla, the larger seeds, and the compact cushion-like growth form, or pulvinatiform. Some other traits shared with some taxa are the tricolored corolla and the infolded/revolute condition of the leaf margin to some degree, but in N. asuncionensis, this last character is extreme as it is not possible to lift and open the foliar blade without ripping it.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Comparison between Nama asuncionensis and morphologically similar taxa, taken from descriptions inShreve & Wiggins (1964),Hickman (1993),Pérez Calix &Carranza-González (2005), andTaylor (2012).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(con las variantes bosque de encino y bosque de encinopino). Para la identificación de las especies se utilizaron claves de fascículos y capítulos de Flora del Bajío y Regiones Adyacentes (Fryxell, 1993;Ballard, 1994;Calderón de Rzedowski y Rzedowski, 1994Carranza-González y Madrigal-Sánchez, 1995;García y Koch, 1995;Fernández-Nava, 1996; Rzedowski y Calderón de Rzedowski, 1997Rzedowski, , 2002Rzedowski, , 2011Daniel y Acosta-Castellanos, 2003;Lorea-Hernández, 2004;Pérez-Calix y Carranza González, 2005;Steinmann, 2005;Andrade et al, 2007;Carranza, 2007Carranza, , 2008Espejo-Serna et al, 2009, 2010aRzedowski et al, 2011Rzedowski et al, , 2016Sosa y Valdivieso, 2013;González-Elizondo y González-Elizondo, 2015;Martínez, 2015), Flora Fanerogámica del Valle de México (Calderón de Rzedowski y Rzedowski, 2005) y Flora Mesoamericana (Hoch et al, 2009;Stevens y Morales, 2009;Pool y Knapp, 2012), con apoyo de especialistas del herbario SLPM. Para la clasificación de angiospermas se utilizó la clasificación del Angiosperm Phylogeny Group (APG) IV (APG, 2016), y para monilofitas y gimnospermas las de Christenhusz et al (2011a,b).…”
Section: Trabajo De Campo Y Gabineteunclassified
“…Género de aproximadamente 20 especies, distribuidas ampliamente desde el sur de Estados Unidos hasta las Antillas, Asia y África. Para México y Oaxaca se han reportado 2 especies, para San Juan Colorado una especie (Nash, 1979a;Pérez-Calix & Carranza-González, 2005;García-Mendoza, 2011;.…”
Section: Gyrocarpus Mocinoi Espejounclassified
“…Género americano aparentemente monotípico, o bien, con muy pocas especies, propias de ambientes intensamente perturbados, con amplia distribución en México, Centroamérica, las Antillas y Sudamérica. Para México y Oaxaca se han registrado 2 especies(Nash, 1979a;Pérez-Calix & Carranza-González, 2005;García-Mendoza, 2011; y para San Juan Colorado una. Wigandia urens (Ruiz & Pav.)…”
unclassified