This chapter details the research process the author employed in depth, highlighting the underpinning paradigm, methodology, methods, data analysis process, and trustworthiness measures. The underpinning philosophy, interpretivisim, is the theoretical foundation of the qualitative research methodology: phenomenological ethnography. Such a foundation not only offers an etic-emic-combined lens through which to view the research context but also a hermeneutic approach to interpreting data. As mentioned, phenomenological ethnography, which combines hermeneutic phenomenology and ethnography, is the methodology for the current research, and it requires a series of fieldwork research methods to be employed to collect data. These research methods include: participant observation online and offline, ethnographic interviews, phenomenological interviews, analysis of the research participants' class materials and teaching diary, and using the researcher as a tool. Just as interpretivisim in current research deters an etic-emic combined vision to read the research (that will be covered in later sections), the ethnographor's positionality and reflexivity symbolize such a vision. The data analysis includes three stages, including a thick description, case studies, and theory generation; and in more detail, qualitative data analysis techniques, such as life histories, thematic analysis, discourse and multimodal discourse analysis, and systematic and cross cases comparison to carry out the three steps of data analysis. Positionality and reflexivity are employed to reflect the nature of interpretivist research; this lets the readers know the entire study offer nothing but the author's interpretation of reality. To increase readability and benefit readers, the map (Fig. 3.1) has been produced.