2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.hisfam.2011.03.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Family, clergy, conviviality and morality among the Greek-Orthodox in Izmir at the end of the Empire

Abstract: This paper discusses the intricate relation between aspects of social life and the antagonism of the administrative institutions in a particular locality. By using cases of divorce decisions as well as contested weddings among people from different confessions which, despite the fact that they took place in Izmir were reported to and investigated by the Greek-Orthodox Patriarchate of Constantinople, it aspires to shed light on those liminal aspects where locality and conviviality are transgressed in the name o… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The family is the first place of education for students, which teaches about good and avoiding or not committing evil. The social and psychological development of healthy children is based on shared conceptual knowledge about right and wrong, which is the inculcation of values from the environment called family [3], [19]- [21].…”
Section: The Effect Of Family Environment On Student Morality and Lea...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The family is the first place of education for students, which teaches about good and avoiding or not committing evil. The social and psychological development of healthy children is based on shared conceptual knowledge about right and wrong, which is the inculcation of values from the environment called family [3], [19]- [21].…”
Section: The Effect Of Family Environment On Student Morality and Lea...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This does not mean, however, that these older institutions entirely lost their role vis-á-vis the segments of the population which they represented. With regard to the millet s, for example, Kechriotis (2011) has argued that – in spite of the legal secularisation and the granting of equal rights – they were even strengthened in the late Ottoman period. They assumed new roles in an urban world that was becoming progressively more anonymous and in which the community could increasingly be avoided by those choosing to do so.…”
Section: Fields Of Organised Convivial Interaction In the Ottoman Empirementioning
confidence: 99%