Holomorphic 2-forms on Kähler surfaces lead to "Local Gromov-Witten invariants" of spin curves. This paper shows how to derive sum formulas for such local GW invariants from the sum formula for GW invariants of certain ruled surfaces. These sum formulas also verify the Maulik-Pandharipande formulas that were recently proved by Kiem and Li.Let X be a Kähler surface with a holomorphic 2-form α. The real part of α, also denoted by α, then induces an almost complex structure on X :Here J is the Kähler structure on X and K α is the endomorphism of T X defined by the formula u, K α v = α(u, v) where , is the Kähler metric on X. The almost complex structure J α satisfies a remarkable Image Localization Property :• if f is a J α -holomorphic map into X that represents a non-zero (1,1) class then the image of f lies in the zero set D of the holomorphic 2-form αFor simplicity, assume X is a (minimal) surface of general type and D is smooth. The normal bundle N to D is then a theta characteristic on D, i.e., N is a square root of the canonical bundle of D. The pair (D, N ) is called a spin curve of genus h where h is the genus of D. The total space N D of N has a tautological holomorphic 2-form α that induces, by the same manner as in (0.1), an almost complex structure J α on N D satisfying the image localization property, namely M g,n (N D , d[D], J α ) = M g,n (D, d).Consequently, the moduli space of J α -holomorphic maps is compact, so it represents a (virtual) fundamental class that defines local GW invariants of the spin curve (D, N ). These local GW invariants depend only on the genus h and the parity p ≡ h 0 (N ) (mod 2) and GW invariants of Kähler surfaces with p g > 0 are the sum of local GW invariants associated to spin curves [LP1]. GW invariants count maps from connected domains, while Gromov-Taubes invariants count maps from not necessarily connected domains. These GT invariants can be obtained from GW * χ,n (U, dS) every genus zero (irreducible) component is ghost component. It thus follows from the stability and the relation between ψ i class and st * φ i class (cf.[KM] page 388) that