1978
DOI: 10.1086/260710
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Family Migration Decisions

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

17
536
2
39

Year Published

1999
1999
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1,065 publications
(594 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
17
536
2
39
Order By: Relevance
“…In essence, it controls for unobserved heterogeneity between households which affects the propensity of migration among their members. This approach also provides further insight into the health selectivity of migration because it 15 conceptualizes migration as a household decision-making process, which is often documented in developing countries (Bhattacharyya, 1985;Lauby & Stark, 1988;Mincer, 1978). In other words, the FE model examines not only the question of whether migrants tend to be healthier on average than nonmigrants, but also whether within a household, healthier members are more likely to move than less healthy members.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In essence, it controls for unobserved heterogeneity between households which affects the propensity of migration among their members. This approach also provides further insight into the health selectivity of migration because it 15 conceptualizes migration as a household decision-making process, which is often documented in developing countries (Bhattacharyya, 1985;Lauby & Stark, 1988;Mincer, 1978). In other words, the FE model examines not only the question of whether migrants tend to be healthier on average than nonmigrants, but also whether within a household, healthier members are more likely to move than less healthy members.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This research frames the effects of union dissolution on migration within the context of family migration decision-making (see DaVanzo 1976;Sandell 1977, andMincer 1978 for a discussion of basic concepts). The family context is relevant for two reasons.…”
Section: Conceptual Frameworkmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The family context is relevant for two reasons. First, previous family migration decisions determine the place of residence at the time of dissolution, which in turn influences the consequent post-dissolution migration decision (Mincer 1978). Hence, it is necessary to understand the structure of previous family migration decisions in order to understand the nature of migration decisions at the time of dissolution.…”
Section: Conceptual Frameworkmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations