1995
DOI: 10.1080/10749357.1995.11754079
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Family perspectives from three aphasia centers in Ontario, Canada

Abstract: Speech-language pathologists and social workers at the three Aphasia Centres in Ontario, Canada, work in partnership with aphasic adults and their families to increase communicative access to participation in various aspects of social and community life. The delivery of optimal service in this context requires an expansion of the traditional role played by speech-language pathologists in the field of aphasia. Illustrative ideas, activities, and programs developed by the three centers are described with emphasi… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

1998
1998
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 5 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To provide more accessible communicative resources for the consent process, I developed an illustrated consent form. I used images from Pictographic Communication Resources (Kagan, Winckel, & Shumway, 1996), which Kagan (1998) created to facilitate communicative access in supported conversation approaches. My consent form (see Figures 1 and 2) matches concise text with supporting images in an attempt to make communicative modes available for a range of communicators’ abilities and preferences.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To provide more accessible communicative resources for the consent process, I developed an illustrated consent form. I used images from Pictographic Communication Resources (Kagan, Winckel, & Shumway, 1996), which Kagan (1998) created to facilitate communicative access in supported conversation approaches. My consent form (see Figures 1 and 2) matches concise text with supporting images in an attempt to make communicative modes available for a range of communicators’ abilities and preferences.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%