Family psychoeducation and therapeutic alliance focused interventions for parents of a daughter or son with a severe mental illness

Levy-Frank, Itamar; Hasson‐Ohayon, Ilanit; Kravetz, Shlomo; Roe, David

doi:10.1016/j.psychres.2011.02.012

Cited by 27 publications

(29 citation statements)

References 29 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…Levy‐Frank et al. () reached different conclusions. They compared the effectiveness of TAFI versus a family psychoeducational intervention adapted from Multifamily Group Therapy (McFarlane, ).…”

Section: Comparative Studies Of Process‐related Variablesmentioning

confidence: 96%

“…Levy‐Frank et al. () conducted a qualitative exploration of their efficacy study of two different approaches (Levy‐Frank, Hasson‐Ohayon, Kravetz, & Roe, ): a psychoeducational family intervention (PEFI) and a therapeutic alliance focused intervention (TAFI). In general, participants mentioned empathy, positive regard, guidance, and advising as the main techniques that helped them to make positive changes.…”

Section: Studies On Participants’ Opinions About the Intervention Recmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

What do We Know about Family Interventions for Psychosis at the Process Level? A Systematic Review

Grácio¹,

Gonçalves-Pereira²,

Leff

2015

Family Process

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The evidence regarding effectiveness of family interventions for psychosis (FIP) is strong and consistent. However, there is a gap in the research on the process of these interventions, and little is known about their active ingredients. This review aims to identify the active ingredients of FIP. We conducted a systematic literature review, focusing on qualitative research, and analyzed 22 papers in total. We found a single study comprehensively exploring the process of FIP. All other studies focused on particular aspects of process-related variables. The key elements of FIP seem to be the so-called "common therapeutic factors", followed by education about the illness and coping skills training. This review supports the value of a stepped model of intervention according to the needs of the families. However, the evidence reviewed also reveals a gap in the research findings based on the limited research available. FIP are complex, psychosocial interventions with multiple components, and more intensive, qualitative research is needed to establish linkages between process and outcome.

show abstract

Section: Comparative Studies Of Process‐related Variablesmentioning

confidence: 96%

Section: Studies On Participants’ Opinions About the Intervention Recmentioning

confidence: 99%

What do We Know about Family Interventions for Psychosis at the Process Level? A Systematic Review

Grácio¹,

Gonçalves-Pereira²,

Leff

2015

Family Process

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…The Hope Scale was developed and translated to Hebrew demonstrating acceptable internal consistency of ␣ ϭ .80 for its overall scale in the Hebrew version (Dubrov, 2002). In a recent study it demonstrated the following Cronbach's alphas: 0.91 for the total score, 0.82 for the Agency subscale, and 0.83 for the Pathways subscale (Levy-Frank, Hasson-Ohayon, Kravetz, & Roe, 2011). In the current study sample, Cronbach's alpha was 0.86 and ICC ranged from 0.83 to 0.88.…”

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Adaptation and psychometric assessment of the Hebrew version of the Recovery Promoting Relationships Scale (RPRS).

Moran¹,

Zisman‐Ilani²,

Garber-Epstein³

et al. 2014

Psychiatric Rehabilitation Journal

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Recovery is supported by relationships that are characterized by human centeredness, empowerment and a hopeful approach. The Recovery Promoting Relationships Scale (RPRS; Russinova, Rogers, & Ellison, 2006) assesses consumer-provider relationships from the consumer perspective. Here we present the adaptation and psychometric assessment of a Hebrew version of the RPRS. The RPRS was translated to Hebrew (RPRS-Heb) using multiple strategies to assure conceptual soundness. Then 216 mental health consumers were administered the RPRS-Heb as part of a larger project initiative implementing illness management and recovery intervention (IMR) in community settings. Psychometric testing included assessment of the factor structure, reliability, and validity using the Hope Scale, the Working Alliance Inventory, and the Recovery Assessment Scale. The RPRS-Heb factor structure replicated the two factor structures found in the original scale with minor exceptions. Reliability estimates were good: Cronbach's alpha for the total scale was 0.94. An estimate of 0.93 for the Recovery-Promoting Strategies factor, and 0.86 for the Core Relationship. Concurrent validity was confirmed using the Working Alliance Scale (rp = .51, p < .001) and the Hope Scale (rp = .43, p < .001). Criterion validity was examined using the Recovery Assessment Scale (rp = .355, p < .05). The study yielded a 23-item RPRS-Heb version with a psychometrically sound factor structure, satisfactory reliability, and concurrent validity tested against the Hope, Alliance, and Recovery Assessment scales. Outcomes are discussed in the context of the original scale properties and a similar Dutch initiative. The RPRS-Heb can serve as a valuable tool for studying recovery promoting relationships with Hebrew speaking population.

show abstract

“…Os familiares e amigos são evitados para se furtar dar corpo a um diagnóstico negado. Embora a esperança de melhoria seja sempre acalentada os sucessivos retrocessos demoram a dar sinais geradores de algum otimismo (Levy-Frank, Hasson-Ohayon, Kravetz, & Roe, 2011).…”

Section: Introductionunclassified

Grupo De Suporte À Família Da Pessoa Com Doença Mental Grave: Espaço De Partilha Na Adversidade

Gomes

Lopes²,

Monteiro³

et al. 2017

Rev Psi Divers Saúde

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Objetivo: compreender as condições e contexto que levam os familiares de doentes com doença mental grave a participarem no grupo de suporte num Hospital Psiquiátrico. Método: Estudo qualitativo, segundo Grounded Theory. Participantes- familiares de doentes que frequentam o Hospital de dia. Procedimentos: sessões de grupo áudio-gravadas, entrevistas a membros da equipa de saúde, questionário aos familiares, notas de campo de incidentes críticos. Resultados: as condições e contexto que fazem com que os familiares se reúnam no grupo de suporte é a aliança na adversidade devido ao estigma da doença mental que devasta a vida das pessoas doentes e suas famílias em todas as dimensões do seu quotidiano pelo que o grupo de suporte constitui um porto de abrigo. Conclusão: no grupo os familiares partilham aprendizagens, estratégias e aprendem a gerir o quotidiano incerto. Esta é uma estratégia relevante para melhorar o cuidado profissional que é dado as pessoas com doença mental grave e seus familiares em casa.

show abstract

Family psychoeducation and therapeutic alliance focused interventions for parents of a daughter or son with a severe mental illness

Cited by 27 publications

References 29 publications

What do We Know about Family Interventions for Psychosis at the Process Level? A Systematic Review

What do We Know about Family Interventions for Psychosis at the Process Level? A Systematic Review

Adaptation and psychometric assessment of the Hebrew version of the Recovery Promoting Relationships Scale (RPRS).

Grupo De Suporte À Família Da Pessoa Com Doença Mental Grave: Espaço De Partilha Na Adversidade

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About