2000
DOI: 10.2307/146391
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Family Structure and Youths' Outcomes: Which Correlations are Causal?

Abstract: Growing up in a family that lacks a biological father is correlated with a number of poor outcomes for youths. This study uses the National Educational Longitudinal Survey of 1988 (NELS) to examine the extent to which the apparent effects of divorce or remarriage are not causal, but are due to pre-existing problems or advantages of the family or youth. We find that the correlations between family structure and youth outcomes are causal: neither divorce nor remarriage appear to be related to pre-existing charac… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
78
3
1

Year Published

2004
2004
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 115 publications
(87 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
5
78
3
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Cherlin et al 1991;Painter and Levine 2000;Piketty 2003). The hypothesis is that the poorer schooling attainment of children from non-intact families does not reflect the lack of investment of both biological parents, rather it reflects pre-existing disadvantages of the family (e.g.…”
Section: A Related Literaturementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Cherlin et al 1991;Painter and Levine 2000;Piketty 2003). The hypothesis is that the poorer schooling attainment of children from non-intact families does not reflect the lack of investment of both biological parents, rather it reflects pre-existing disadvantages of the family (e.g.…”
Section: A Related Literaturementioning
confidence: 99%
“…25 The triangular nature of the model implies that the simultaneity can be ignored and the model is consistently estimated using a seemingly unrelated regressions model such as the bivariate probit. 26 For a discussion of the sensitivity of bivariate probit models to the choice of exclusion restrictions, see for example, Manski et al, (1992) or Painter and Levine, (2000).…”
Section: Investigating the Validity And Power Of Our Instrumentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The primary methodological difficulty in estimating equation (3) (Painter and Levine 2000;Waldfogel et al 2002;Ruhm 2004;Antecol and Bedard 2007;and Cardosa and Verner 2007). Second, we estimate bivariate probit models that account for the possible correlation in the unobserved determinants of a youth's risky behavior and his or her family's welfare history.…”
Section: Estimation Strategymentioning
confidence: 99%