2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.marpol.2017.03.012
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

FAO's statistic data and sustainability of fisheries and aquaculture: Comments on Pauly and Zeller (2017)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
33
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 48 publications
(33 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
33
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The data used in our analysis are reconstructed catch data that attempt to correct for underreporting ( 12 , 13 ). Some analysts have criticized catch reconstructions on a methodological basis, suggesting high uncertainty about the reliability of the reconstructions and claiming that FAO’s annual catch reports are “the only validated source of global fisheries landings” ( 14 ), but see ( 15 ). Reconstructed data suggest catches perhaps 30% larger than those reported by FAO ( 13 ), which makes our estimates of fishing revenue and profits larger than they would be had we used FAO’s raw data.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The data used in our analysis are reconstructed catch data that attempt to correct for underreporting ( 12 , 13 ). Some analysts have criticized catch reconstructions on a methodological basis, suggesting high uncertainty about the reliability of the reconstructions and claiming that FAO’s annual catch reports are “the only validated source of global fisheries landings” ( 14 ), but see ( 15 ). Reconstructed data suggest catches perhaps 30% larger than those reported by FAO ( 13 ), which makes our estimates of fishing revenue and profits larger than they would be had we used FAO’s raw data.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Specifically, the period between years 1975 and 2000 was characterized by the highest catches, much of which were not reported to FAO (Figure 1). Catch data from FAO has often come under attack for being inaccurate at best, and unreliable at worst (Lobo and Jacques, 2017;Pauly and Zeller, 2017;Ye et al, 2017). It should be kept in mind, however, that FAO reports in its database only what is reported to it.…”
Section: Discussion Comparing Reported and Estimated Total Landingsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…FAO acknowledges its concerns on the quality of biomass production data, and data reported by FAO on behalf of reporting countries are incomplete with underrepresentation of nonindustrial (e.g., artisanal, subsistence, and recreational) and illegal fisheries [75][76][77] . Therefore, we use the reconstruction of wild marine catches from Sea Around Us to correct the FAO database for the underrepresented fish harvest.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Uncertainty or accuracy of fish biomass production data is debatable, and is not straightforward to assess [75][76][77][78][79] . One alternative strategy is to assign scores, which are associated with certain categorized uncertainty levels, for each data source that contributes to fish biomass production based on expert judgments 78 .…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%