2022
DOI: 10.14348/molcells.2022.2054
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Fast and Precise: How to Measure Meiotic Crossovers in Arabidopsis

Abstract: During meiosis, homologous chromosomes (homologs) pair and undergo genetic recombination via assembly and disassembly of the synaptonemal complex. Meiotic recombination is initiated by excess formation of DNA double-strand breaks (DSBs), among which a subset are repaired by reciprocal genetic exchange, called crossovers (COs). COs generate genetic variations across generations, profoundly affecting genetic diversity and breeding. At least one CO between homologs is essential for the first meiotic chromosome se… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2
1
1
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 98 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Since then, cytological methods, such as chromosome spreading, fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH), and immunostaining, have been developed as classical and efficient approaches to interrogate meiosis and meiotic recombination in vivo (Armstrong, Sanchez‐Moran, & Franklin, 2009; Chelysheva et al., 2010; Wang, Cheng, Lu, Timofejeva, & Ma, 2014). Conventionally, CO interference quantification requires time‐consuming procedures, such as the generation of genome‐wide sets of pollen fluorescence‐tagged lines (FTLs) or construction of F 2 segregation populations (Kim & Choi, 2022) for monitoring meiotic recombination. By contrast, cytological assays have become convenient and effective approaches to analyze the number and distribution of COs and CO interference during meiosis (Armstrong, Caryl, Jones, & Franklin, 2002; Sanchez Moran, Armstrong, Santos, Franklin, & Jones, 2001).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since then, cytological methods, such as chromosome spreading, fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH), and immunostaining, have been developed as classical and efficient approaches to interrogate meiosis and meiotic recombination in vivo (Armstrong, Sanchez‐Moran, & Franklin, 2009; Chelysheva et al., 2010; Wang, Cheng, Lu, Timofejeva, & Ma, 2014). Conventionally, CO interference quantification requires time‐consuming procedures, such as the generation of genome‐wide sets of pollen fluorescence‐tagged lines (FTLs) or construction of F 2 segregation populations (Kim & Choi, 2022) for monitoring meiotic recombination. By contrast, cytological assays have become convenient and effective approaches to analyze the number and distribution of COs and CO interference during meiosis (Armstrong, Caryl, Jones, & Franklin, 2002; Sanchez Moran, Armstrong, Santos, Franklin, & Jones, 2001).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, COs drive genetic exchange between homologous chromosomes, which generates novel allelic combinations and genetic diversity among offspring (Fernandes et al, 2018, Wang and. The first step towards understanding the underlying mechanism of CO formation is to accurately detect COs. To date, several approaches have been developed to measure the location and frequency of COs in plants, including immunocytological analyses, fluorescence-tagged lines (FTLs) systems and sequencing-based methods (reviewed in Kim and Choi, 2022) (Kim and Choi, 2022). COs can be cytologically detected by counting the number of chiasmata from pollen mother cells (PMCs) based on the bivalent shape using fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) staining of specific regions or whole chromosomes (Moran et al, 2001, Sanchez-Moran et al, 2002, López et al, 2012.…”
Section: Approaches To Detect Meiotic Cosmentioning
confidence: 99%