1993
DOI: 10.1007/bf02446662
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Fast and reliable QRS alignment technique for high-frequency analysis of signal-averaged ECG

Abstract: The process of QRS alignment as required in signal-averaged ECG can impose serious limitations on the spectral range of the signal output. This effect depends basically on the particular alignment technique being used and on the level and type of noise present in the recorded ECG. In clinical studies where a wide-band (1000 Hz) ECG averager is required, the conventional QRS alignment technique, based on maximum coherence matching (MCM) with a template beat, may not perform consistently well. An alternative QRS… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
21
0

Year Published

2002
2002
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 34 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
1
21
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In this study, the particular SA-ECG denoising technique was not a data-driven type, unlike the current EMD (empirical mode decomposition)-based method. The implemented SA technique uses Lead I or any of the other simultaneously recorded standard limb leads: Lead II, Lead III and the precordial lead V 1 , for extracting the accurate, time-deterministic point associated with the heart ventricular depolarization event during normal sinus rhythm, by means of the single fiducial point (SFP) heart beat alignment technique on the ECG Lead I signal [15], as explained in the following section.…”
Section: Denoising Control Method: Signal Averaged Ecg (Sa-ecg)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this study, the particular SA-ECG denoising technique was not a data-driven type, unlike the current EMD (empirical mode decomposition)-based method. The implemented SA technique uses Lead I or any of the other simultaneously recorded standard limb leads: Lead II, Lead III and the precordial lead V 1 , for extracting the accurate, time-deterministic point associated with the heart ventricular depolarization event during normal sinus rhythm, by means of the single fiducial point (SFP) heart beat alignment technique on the ECG Lead I signal [15], as explained in the following section.…”
Section: Denoising Control Method: Signal Averaged Ecg (Sa-ecg)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Signal measured from the isovoltaic area extending between the S wave terminus and the initial inflection point of the T wave is considered to be noise, as there is a pause in cardiac electrical output in this area. The QRS complex is the highest amplitude area of the ECG and is measured as the signal component [7]. Figure 6 shows the measurement areas on an averaged ECG trace.…”
Section: Snr Measurement Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(5) If d(t) becomes a zero-mean process, then the iteration stops and d(t) is an IMF1, named c 1 (t); otherwise, go to step (1) and replace x(t) with d(t). (6) Calculate the residue signal r(t)=x(t)íc 1 (t).…”
Section: (4) Calculate the Difference Signal D(t)=x(t)ím(t)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…During an ECG measurement various noises, such as muscle noise, baselines wander and power-line interferences are recorded in the ECG signals and interfere with the ECG-information identification. Therefore, ECG noise reduction is an important issue and has been studied for many years [1][2]. Numerous signal-processing methods have been used in the studies of ECG noise reduction.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%