2006
DOI: 10.1007/11866763_94
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Fast and Robust Clinical Triple-Region Image Segmentation Using One Level Set Function

Abstract: Abstract. This paper proposes a novel method for clinical triple-region image segmentation using a single level set function. Triple-region image segmentation finds wide application in the computer aided X-ray, CT, MRI and ultrasound image analysis and diagnosis. Usually multiple level set functions are used consecutively or simultaneously to segment triple-region medical images. These approaches are either time consuming or suffer from the convergence problems. With the new proposed triple-regions level set e… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
2
2
2

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Several studies have shown that the variational, active contour/level set formalism can lead to effective algorithms to solve many vision problems such as tracking, 16 motion estimation, 17 and 3D interpretation, 18 as well as many medical image analysis problems. [1][2][3] This formalism is well suited to medical image segmentation because it can balance the contribution of image data and prior knowledge in a principled, flexible and transparent way. Level set methods are commonly based on the optimization of an objective functional which contains two types of terms: data terms, which measure the fidelity of segmentation to image intensities, and prior terms, which traduce prior knowledge learned from a set of relevant images and segmentation examples.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several studies have shown that the variational, active contour/level set formalism can lead to effective algorithms to solve many vision problems such as tracking, 16 motion estimation, 17 and 3D interpretation, 18 as well as many medical image analysis problems. [1][2][3] This formalism is well suited to medical image segmentation because it can balance the contribution of image data and prior knowledge in a principled, flexible and transparent way. Level set methods are commonly based on the optimization of an objective functional which contains two types of terms: data terms, which measure the fidelity of segmentation to image intensities, and prior terms, which traduce prior knowledge learned from a set of relevant images and segmentation examples.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These approaches are computationally intensive and therefore time consuming (Jeleń, Krzyżak and Fevens, 2006). On the other hand, level set methods, which, also proved to be a powerful tool for medical image segmentation (Li, Xu, Gui and Fox, 2005;Droske, Meyer, Rumpf and K., 2001;Deng and Tsui, 2002;Tsai, Yezzi, Wells, Tempany, Tucker, Fan, Grimson and Willsky, 2003;Li, Fevens, Krzyżak, Jin and Li, 2006), involve fewer computations than Hough transform approaches and therefore achieve faster computational times. Level sets were first described by Osher and Sethian (1988) as a method for capturing moving fronts.…”
Section: Preprocessingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We have chosen these two constraints due to their descriptive power in segmenting compound objects. The level set-based methods have been widely used in computer vision over the years and proven to be useful for medical image segmentation [5], [29], [41], [49] due to their several advantages such as 1) parametrization independence, 2) the ease of implementation, 3) their ability to deal with topological changes, 4) the ease of extendibility from a curve in 2D to higher dimensions (e.g. surfaces and hyper-surfaces) and 5) their ability to impose different image data and prior knowledge terms and control their contributions in segmentation tasks.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%