2018
DOI: 10.48550/arxiv.1804.03616
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Fast and scalable non-parametric Bayesian inference for Poisson point processes

Shota Gugushvili,
Frank van der Meulen,
Moritz Schauer
et al.

Abstract: We study the problem of non-parametric Bayesian estimation of the intensity function of a Poisson point process. The observations are n independent realisations of a Poisson point process on the interval [0, T ]. We propose two related approaches.In both approaches we model the intensity function as piecewise constant on N bins forming a partition of the interval [0, T ]. In the first approach the coefficients of the intensity function are assigned independent gamma priors, leading to a closed form posterior d… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The posterior µ and φ are estimated using the resulting cluster processes. Our framework is close to the stochastic Expectation-Maximization (EM) algorithm [Celeux and Diebolt, 1985] where posterior µ and φ are estimated [Lloyd et al, 2015;Walder and Bishop, 2017;Gugushvili et al, 2018] in the Mstep and random samples of µ and φ are drawn. We adapt the approach of the recent non-parametric Bayesian estimation for Poisson process intensities, termed Laplace Bayesian Poisson process (LBPP) [Walder and Bishop, 2017], to estimate the posterior φ given the sampled branching structure.…”
Section: Hawkes Processmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The posterior µ and φ are estimated using the resulting cluster processes. Our framework is close to the stochastic Expectation-Maximization (EM) algorithm [Celeux and Diebolt, 1985] where posterior µ and φ are estimated [Lloyd et al, 2015;Walder and Bishop, 2017;Gugushvili et al, 2018] in the Mstep and random samples of µ and φ are drawn. We adapt the approach of the recent non-parametric Bayesian estimation for Poisson process intensities, termed Laplace Bayesian Poisson process (LBPP) [Walder and Bishop, 2017], to estimate the posterior φ given the sampled branching structure.…”
Section: Hawkes Processmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Crucially, by following methods proposed in Ref. [17] we avoid the computationally intensive task of computing the explicit posterior distribution, and instead use a Gibbs sampler [18] to efficiently obtain sample trajectories. This allows not only to find the most likely trajectory, but also to estimate uncertainty (e.g.…”
Section: Heart Rate (Inferred)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Here we specify a generative model for heart rate dynamics, which follows the approach introduced in Ref. [17] for general point processes.…”
Section: Heart Rate Dynamics Via Gamma Markov Chainsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We note that the case of i.i.d. data as considered in (Kirichenko and Van Zanten, 2015) and (Gugushvili et al, 2018) is a special case of this model, where γ j (x) = 1, ∀x ∈ [0, 1] d , ∀j = 1, . .…”
Section: Likelihoodmentioning
confidence: 99%