Fast and selective method for biogenic amines determination in wines and beers by ultra high-performance liquid chromatography

Angulo, María Fernanda; Flores, Mauricio; Aranda, Mario; Henriquez‐Aedo, Karem

doi:10.1016/j.foodchem.2019.125689

Cited by 52 publications

(31 citation statements)

References 22 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Biogenic amines detection in food and beverages have some objectives such as to modify the current technique or developing new techniques so they can be applied by analyst, to identify biogenic amines concentration in various products from countries that consume food protein and beverages regularly with high concentration. In addition, the relation between biogenic amines accumulation in food and beverages and the growth of bacteria inside the food and beverages as well as their potential toxicity require intensive investigation (Angulo et al, 2020). Biogenic amines analysis in food and beverages are not straightforward due to biogenic amines structures are very complex and some of them exist in food and beverages but at very low level (below 1 ppm).…”

Section: Biogenic Amines Detection Using Chromatography Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Dansyl chloride, as a popular reagent is more sensitive than benzoyl chloride. It can react with primary and secondary amines and show stability at high temperature Angulo et al (2020) while benzoyl chloride, though it is a fast reagent but it has some drawbacks such as unstable at high temperature and easily degraded even when stored at -20 C (Liu et al, 2020).…”

Section: High Performance Liquid Chromatographymentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Biogenic Amines Detection by Chromatography and Sensor Methods: A Comparative Review

Munir

Badri²,

Heng³

2020

sci. technol. indones.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Biogenic amines (BA) are chemistry compounds shaped by amino acids decarboxylation and exist in protein food and beverages. They are labelled toxic if consumed and some countries prohibit to consume them in high level especially histamine. Two major methods have been used and developed well such as chromatography methods and sensors methods. The common method applied for chromatography namely liquid chromatography (LC) and gas chromatography (GC) while for sensor methods such as optical, chemical and bio sensor. These methods have advantages and disadvantages. For chromatography methods, derivatization methods are required in order to improve their sensitivity and selectivity, nevertheless these methods are very expensive and time-consuming. During derivatization step, it needs more time and bear the risk of an only partial detection due to an incomplete derivatization. Furthermore, sensor methods exist to solve these issues, while they do not require derivatization step, generate a direct signal that can be interpreted by anyone, very fast and simple, yet they have disadvantages in several aspects such as sensitivity, accuracy and selectivity compared to chromatography methods. This review is based on studies about biogenic amines detection from the last decades until now and related to food and beverage samples. Although biogenic amines commonly found in protein-food for decades, new approaches and technical possibilities still required in order to increase the sensitivity, selectivity and accuracy of analytical methods to tackle the complexity by their matrices. The rationale of this study is also to provide data about the comparison of the analytical techniques between conventional and sensor methods. Furthermore, the various approaches of biogenic amines determination and the most applied analytical methods have been reviewed.

show abstract

Section: Biogenic Amines Detection Using Chromatography Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: High Performance Liquid Chromatographymentioning

confidence: 99%

Biogenic Amines Detection by Chromatography and Sensor Methods: A Comparative Review

Munir

Badri²,

Heng³

2020

sci. technol. indones.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Pre-column derivatization was often used to determine amines. The reagents commonly used for the derivatization of amines are 1, 2-diphenylethylenediamine (DPE) [17], dansyl chloride (Dns-Cl) [18], 9-fluorenyl-methyloxycarbonyl chloride (FMOC-Cl) [19], 4chloro -7-nitrobenzo-2-oxa-1,3-diazole (NBD-Cl) [20], 1, 3, 5, 7-tetramethyl-8-(N-hydroxysuccinimidyl butyric ester)difluoroboradiaza-s-indacene (TMBB-Su) [21], and so on. However, these probes present various disadvantages, such as low sensitivity and poor stability.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Analysis of neurotransmitter catecholamines and related amines in human urine and serum by chromatography and capillary electrophoresis with 1, 3, 5, 7-tetramethyl-8-(N-hydroxysuccinimidyl propionic ester)-difluoro-boradiaza-s-indacene

Cao

Zhong

et al. 2022

AChrom

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Two sensitive and effective methods were developed for the detection of catecholamines and related biogenic amines (dopamine, epinephrine, norepinephrine, serotonin, levodopa and tyramine) using high performance liquid chromatography with fluorescence detection and capillary electrophoresis with laser-induced fluorescence detection. A BODIPY fluorescent dye, 1, 3, 5, 7-tetramethyl-8-(N-hydroxysuccinimidyl propionic ester)-difluoroboradiaza- s-indacene was used as pre-column derivatization reagent. The separation and derivatization conditions were optimized in detail. In high performance liquid chromatography with fluorescence detection method, the derivatization reaction was completed at 35 °C for 20 min. At the wavelength of λex/λem = 493 nm/513 nm, dopamine, epinephrine, norepinephrine, and levodopa derivatives achieved baseline separation within 15 min. The limits of detection (S/N = 3) were 1.0, 2.0, 5.0, and 0.5 nmol/L, respectively. In capillary electrophoresis with laser-induced fluorescence detection method, the derivatization reaction was completed at 25 °C for 20 min. Serotonin, tyramine and dopamine derivatives reached baseline separation within 10 min at the wavelength of λex = 473 nm. The limits of detection (S/N = 3) for serotonin, tyramine, and dopamine were 0.3, 0.02, and 0.2 nmol/L, respectively. The amino compounds in human serum and urine samples were detected successfully, and the recoveries were 93.3%–106.7% and 91.0%–103.1%, respectively.

show abstract

“…These conditions setting off histamine need to be derivatized before analysed using liquid or gas chromatography. Furthermore, the derivatizing agents applied will also influence the application of chromatography (Munir & Badri, 2020), 9fluorenylmethyl chloroformate chloride (FMOC-Cl), 6aminoquinolyl-N-hydroxysuccinimidy (AQC), O phthaldialdehyde (OPA), dansyl-, dabsyl-, and benzoyl chloride are derivatizing reagents generally used to derivatize histamine before analyse using HPLC (Angulo et. al., 2020;Bogdanovic et.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Study of Histamine Detection using Liquid Chromatography and Gas Chromatography

Munir¹,

Mackeen²,

Heng³

et al. 2021

ASMScJ

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Histamine is a heterocyclic amine shaped by decarboxylation of the histidine. It is a compound that lack chromophore and involatile. However, the detection of histamine is imperative due to the characteristic of histamine has given several disadvantages in food industry. This paper describes methods for histamine detection by employing high performance liquid chromatography and gas chromatography. The derivatization techniques required for both methods in order to increase the sensitivity of chromatography analysis. Two derivatizing agents were applied in this study such as 9-flourenilmethyl chloroformate (FMOC – Cl) for HPLC analysis whereas for GC analysis a N,O-bis (trimethylsilyl)acetamide (BSA) was used. Method validation was in accordance to Commission Decision 657/2002/CE. The validation of specificity, linearity, precision, accuracy, detection limit and quantitation limit results indicate that the methods were acceptable. The linear range for both methods were at 0.16 – 5.00 µg∙mL-1. The determination of histamine using GC showed the superiority of this instrument compared to HPLC. Method applicability was also checked on real sample namely mackerel in order to acquire a satisfactory recovery for both methods.

show abstract

Fast and selective method for biogenic amines determination in wines and beers by ultra high-performance liquid chromatography

Cited by 52 publications

References 22 publications

Biogenic Amines Detection by Chromatography and Sensor Methods: A Comparative Review

Biogenic Amines Detection by Chromatography and Sensor Methods: A Comparative Review

Analysis of neurotransmitter catecholamines and related amines in human urine and serum by chromatography and capillary electrophoresis with 1, 3, 5, 7-tetramethyl-8-(N-hydroxysuccinimidyl propionic ester)-difluoro-boradiaza-s-indacene

Study of Histamine Detection using Liquid Chromatography and Gas Chromatography

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About