2017
DOI: 10.1007/s11222-017-9744-8
|View full text |Cite|
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Fast covariance estimation for sparse functional data

Abstract: Smoothing of noisy sample covariances is an important component in functional data analysis. We propose a novel covariance smoothing method based on penalized splines and associated software. The proposed method is a bivariate spline smoother that is designed for covariance smoothing and can be used for sparse functional or longitudinal data. We propose a fast algorithm for covariance smoothing using leave-one-subject-out cross-validation. Our simulations show that the proposed method compares favorably agains… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
71
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

4
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 60 publications
(72 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
1
71
0
Order By: Relevance
“…While the estimation procedure described in this paper is similar to that proposed in Cederbaum et al, the procedure has not been implemented in any peer‐reviewed publication. Moreover, our covariance estimation procedure is fast, accurate, and was designed specifically for sparse functional covariance estimation.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…While the estimation procedure described in this paper is similar to that proposed in Cederbaum et al, the procedure has not been implemented in any peer‐reviewed publication. Moreover, our covariance estimation procedure is fast, accurate, and was designed specifically for sparse functional covariance estimation.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This results in estimates trueμ^zfalse(tfalse), Ĉzfalse(s,tfalse), and trueσ^ϵz2. Then, conditional on the observed data Zi,obs=false{Zi,obsfalse(ti1false),,Zi,obsfalse(timifalse)false}, we predict Z i ( t ) by its best linear unbiased predictor (BLUP), trueZ˜ifalse(tfalse)=trueμ^zfalse(tfalse)+Ĉzfalse(t,tifalse){}Ĉzfalse(ti,tifalse)+trueσ^ϵz2Imi1false{Zi,obstrueμ^zfalse(tifalse)false}, where ti=false(ti1,,timifalse)Rmi, Ĉzfalse(t,tifalse)=false{Czfalse(t,ti1false),,Czfalse(t,timifalse)false}Rmi, trueμ^zfalse(…”
Section: Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…CD4 counts have been extensively analyzed using longitudinal data methods, e.g., semiparametric and linear random effects models (Taylor et al, 1994;Zeger and Diggle, 1994;Fan and Zhang, 2000). Recently, functional data methods have also been applied to this data (Yao et al, 2005;Goldsmith et al, 2013;Xiao et al, 2018). While the nonparametric functional data methods are highly flexible and better adapt to subject-specific patterns, they are more difficult to implement and interpret compared to the parametric approaches.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For functional methods, the covariance within a subject is assumed to be smooth with an unknown nonparametric form. The covariance can be estimated by smoothing the sample covariance (Besse and Ramsay, 1986;Yao et al, 2005;Xiao et al, 2018) or constructing a reduced rank approximation by estimating basis functions from smoothed sample curves (James et al, 2000;Peng and Paul, 2009). In contrast, longitudinal data approaches typically assume a simple parametric covariance structure with a few parameters, such as autoregressive or exponential (see Diggle et al (2002) for an overview), or induced by a random effects model (Laird and Ware, 1982).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%