2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijpvp.2020.104163
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Fast ductile fracture: Effect of inertia on propagation resistance and CTOA in pipe steels

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The inertia effect brought by soil backfilling has a significant effect on the dynamic fracture behavior of pipelines. Bassindale 19 first assessed the effect of inertia on CTOA C by altering the density of the material used with the tensile plate model and found inertia has no significant effect on the measured CTOA. However, the maximum velocity in the tensile plate is about 20 m/s, which is far less than those measured in pipe fractures (about 300–400 m/s).…”
Section: Analysis Of Influencing Factors On Pipeline Ctoa Evolutionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The inertia effect brought by soil backfilling has a significant effect on the dynamic fracture behavior of pipelines. Bassindale 19 first assessed the effect of inertia on CTOA C by altering the density of the material used with the tensile plate model and found inertia has no significant effect on the measured CTOA. However, the maximum velocity in the tensile plate is about 20 m/s, which is far less than those measured in pipe fractures (about 300–400 m/s).…”
Section: Analysis Of Influencing Factors On Pipeline Ctoa Evolutionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Zhu et al 18 used cohesive zone model (CZM) to simulate the evolution process of CTOA during crack propagation of buried pipeline and found that the CTOA C increases with the increase of internal pressure, which is inconsistent with Shibanuma's conclusion. Also using the CZM model, Bassindale et al 19 proved that CTOA has nothing to do with the inertia effect caused by soil backfilling through the simulation of crack propagation in large plates, but the crack velocity range studied is far less than that of the pipeline, so it is not clear whether pipeline CTOA has the same conclusion.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The inertia effect brought by soil backfilling has a significant effect on the dynamic fracture behavior of pipelines. Bassindale 18 first assessed the effect of inertia on CTOA C by altering the density of the material used with the tensile plate model and found inertia has no significant effect on the measured CTOA. However, the maximum velocity in the tensile plate is ˜20 m/s, which is far less than those measured in pipe fractures (˜300-400 m/s).…”
Section: Effects Of the Inertia Backfill Effectmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Zhu et al 17 used CZM to simulate the evolution process of CTOA during crack propagation of buried pipeline and found that the CTOA C increases with the increase of internal pressure, which is inconsistent with Shibanuma's conclusion. Bassindale et al 18 proved that CTOA has nothing to do with the inertia effect caused by soil backfilling through the simulation of crack propagation in large plates, but the crack velocity range studied is far less than that of the pipeline, so it is not clear whether pipeline CTOA has the same conclusion.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The ductile fracture mechanics parameters for the cracked pipes subjected to internal pressure is important in structural integrity assessment of defective components [8][9][10]. The safety assessment of these structures and the comprehension of failure mechanisms are essential to study the reliability of pipelines for the liquid or gas transport [11][12][13][14]. Probabilistic fracture mechanics is a means of quantifying the failure probability resulting from uncertainties in the values of the parameters used to perform a failure assessment of cracked structures through probabilistic analysis techniques [15][16][17].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%