2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.astropartphys.2016.02.006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Fast Fourier transform to measure pressure coefficient of muons in the GRAPES-3 experiment

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

4
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For the baseline unperturbed GMF is used to get the muons in nine directions and for IMF calculated for every four minute interval. The nine simulated profiles showed very high correlations of -0.89±0.05 between the observed and simulated 'muon burst' which is described elsewhere [5,6,7]. The above mentioned process require large scale computing as it took ∼2 months of computation time by using 1280 core GRAPES-3 computer cluster.…”
Section: Pos(icrc2019)1176mentioning
confidence: 60%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…For the baseline unperturbed GMF is used to get the muons in nine directions and for IMF calculated for every four minute interval. The nine simulated profiles showed very high correlations of -0.89±0.05 between the observed and simulated 'muon burst' which is described elsewhere [5,6,7]. The above mentioned process require large scale computing as it took ∼2 months of computation time by using 1280 core GRAPES-3 computer cluster.…”
Section: Pos(icrc2019)1176mentioning
confidence: 60%
“…On 22 June 2015, GRAPES-3 muon telescope (G3MT) observed a 'muon burst' which started at 19:00 UT and lasted for two hours riding on a large Forbush decrease (minimum change of -2.5% ) and solar diurnal anisotropy variations. By using Fast Fourier Transform (FFT) analysis, this event was studied in details which is described elsewhere [5,6,7]. This phenomena is based on the assumption of lowering the cutoff rigidity (R C ), allowed more low energy cosmic rays to enter Earth and results the excess of muon flux which was observed in all nine directions simultaneously.…”
Section: Conventional Simulationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This double-cut procedure ensured the removal of sections of low-quality data [22,25]. Thereafter, the muon rates were converted into a percent change with respect to their six year mean after correcting for atmospheric pressure variations [38,39]. The data still contained slow variations caused by the 27 day, the annual, the 11 year, and 22 year solar cycles as well as faster effects such as the sidereal and solar diurnal variations.…”
Section: Data Analysis and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The flux variation in the PCR caused due to various phenomenon as mentioned above could be studied through the measurement of muon flux. In addition, muon flux is also modulated by the atmospheric parameters such as pressure and temperature [1,2]. Study of the muon flux variation during thunderstorms has emerged as an exciting area [3].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%