2018
DOI: 10.1103/physrevapplied.9.011002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Fast Low-Current Spin-Orbit-Torque Switching of Magnetic Tunnel Junctions through Atomic Modifications of the Free-Layer Interfaces

Abstract: Future applications of spin-orbit torque will require new mechanisms to improve the efficiency for switching nanoscale magnetic tunnel junctions (MTJs), while also controlling the magnetic dynamics to achieve fast, nanosecond scale performance with low write error rates. Here we demonstrate a strategy to simultaneously enhance the interfacial magnetic anisotropy energy and suppress interfacial spin memory loss by introducing sub-atomic and monatomic layers of Hf at the top and bottom interfaces of the ferromag… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
102
2

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 89 publications
(105 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
1
102
2
Order By: Relevance
“…[18] As compared in Table I, the value of ξ ≈ 0.30 DL j is significantly higher than those previously obtained in W devices (ξ ≈ − 0.20 DL j ), [24] Pt devices (ξ ≈ 0.12 DL j ), [14] and Pt 0.85 Hf 0.15 devices (ξ ≈ 0.23 DL j ) [17] when the spin current attenuation by the Hf spacer layers (A ≤ 1) is taken into account (note that A was assumed to be unity in previous reports [14,15,17,23] when calculating ξ DL j ). [18] As compared in Table I, the value of ξ ≈ 0.30 DL j is significantly higher than those previously obtained in W devices (ξ ≈ − 0.20 DL j ), [24] Pt devices (ξ ≈ 0.12 DL j ), [14] and Pt 0.85 Hf 0.15 devices (ξ ≈ 0.23 DL j ) [17] when the spin current attenuation by the Hf spacer layers (A ≤ 1) is taken into account (note that A was assumed to be unity in previous reports [14,15,17,23] when calculating ξ DL j ).…”
Section: Direct Current Switchingmentioning
confidence: 60%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…[18] As compared in Table I, the value of ξ ≈ 0.30 DL j is significantly higher than those previously obtained in W devices (ξ ≈ − 0.20 DL j ), [24] Pt devices (ξ ≈ 0.12 DL j ), [14] and Pt 0.85 Hf 0.15 devices (ξ ≈ 0.23 DL j ) [17] when the spin current attenuation by the Hf spacer layers (A ≤ 1) is taken into account (note that A was assumed to be unity in previous reports [14,15,17,23] when calculating ξ DL j ). [18] As compared in Table I, the value of ξ ≈ 0.30 DL j is significantly higher than those previously obtained in W devices (ξ ≈ − 0.20 DL j ), [24] Pt devices (ξ ≈ 0.12 DL j ), [14] and Pt 0.85 Hf 0.15 devices (ξ ≈ 0.23 DL j ) [17] when the spin current attenuation by the Hf spacer layers (A ≤ 1) is taken into account (note that A was assumed to be unity in previous reports [14,15,17,23] when calculating ξ DL j ).…”
Section: Direct Current Switchingmentioning
confidence: 60%
“…[15] Low value of 4πM eff reduces the critical current for antidamping switching. [15] Low value of 4πM eff reduces the critical current for antidamping switching.…”
Section: Energy-efficient Ultrafast Sot-mrams Based Onmentioning
confidence: 98%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…1(a)). Meanwhile, a high ρxx of a spin Hall material (e.g., ρxx ≥ 200 μΩ cm in Ta [2], W [8,13,14], and topological insulators [15,16]) is problematic for applications that require a high endurance [17] and low device impedance (∝ρxx) [18]. For example, use of a large-ρxx spin Hall material (e.g., ρxx =200 -300 μΩ cm for W, see Fig.…”
Section: *Lz442@cornelledumentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[23][24][25] It is known that the in-plane magnetic tunnel junction (MTJ) device by a spin transfer torque does not need an external field but takes a relatively long time for the switch due to an incubation time. [28][29][30][31][32] This in-plane device offers various possibilities in application so that more intensive study is needed.In this work, we investigated the new aspect of in-plane SOT device depending on the amplitudes of damping-like torque, field-like torque, the Oersted field torque and demagnetization torque by a macro spin simulation. [28][29][30][31][32] This in-plane device offers various possibilities in application so that more intensive study is needed.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%