2022
DOI: 10.1093/mnras/stac561
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Fast map-based simulations of systematics in CMB surveys including effects of the scanning strategy

Abstract: We present approaches to quickly simulate systematics affecting CMB observations, including the effects of the scanning strategy. Using summary properties of the scan we capture features of full time ordered data (TOD) simulations, allowing maps and power spectra to be generated at much improved speed for a number of systematics – the cases we present experienced speed ups of 3-4 orders of magnitude when implementing the map-based approaches. We demonstrate the effectiveness of the approaches at capturing the … Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 57 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…• Differential Gain g: The absolute value of the difference between the maximal peak directivity of the beam in the E and H-planes (1), and respectively, expected to be 1% or lower [18,21,23] to avoid contaminations of the B-mode signal,…”
Section: Beam Systematics For Cmb Observationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…• Differential Gain g: The absolute value of the difference between the maximal peak directivity of the beam in the E and H-planes (1), and respectively, expected to be 1% or lower [18,21,23] to avoid contaminations of the B-mode signal,…”
Section: Beam Systematics For Cmb Observationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In these analyses, the detectors and their coupled focal optics are merged into a single pixel object receiving two orthogonal polarisations. The beam of each pixel constituting the focal plane is reshaped by the modelled telescope fore-optics and sky maps are either reconstructed by projecting the simulated detector signals through the instrument model or by convoluting an input sky map with the telescope beam following its devised scanning strategy [21,22]. In order to establish the performances of our metamaterial-based lenslet for CMB experiments, it is useful to underline some optics induced systematics and properties:…”
Section: Beam Systematics For Cmb Observationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…• Gaussicity 𝜂 0 : Fraction of the power contained in the beam main lobe corresponding to the 0 th order optical mode of a Laguerre-Gaussian Beam (LGB) beam decomposition, • Differential Gain 𝚫g: The absolute value of the difference between the maximal peak directivity of the beam in the E and H-planes (1), 𝑔 𝐸 and 𝑔 𝐻 respectively, expected to be 1% or lower [18,21,23] to avoid contaminations of the B-mode signal, • Beam Ellipticity E: Square of the numerical eccentricity of the beam (2), where 𝑤 𝐸 0 and 𝑤 𝐻 0 are the beam waist in the E and H-planes, • Cross-polarisation Beam Shapes: The cross-polarisation is defined as per [24] and effectively describes a leakage from one polarisation to the other. For axi-symmetrical optics radiating a linearly polarised wave, the cross-polarisation shapes presents a quadrupole symmetry near the optical axis, transforming to a dipole-like symmetry off axis which can be derived in the limit case of a circular aperture [25].…”
Section: Beam Systematics For Cmb Observationsmentioning
confidence: 99%