2012
DOI: 10.1007/s11390-012-1211-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Fast Multi-Operator Image Resizing and Evaluation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
37
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 40 publications
(37 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
0
37
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Based on the results in Fig. 4, comparing the results of image downsizing to 75 % width of the original image, it is clear that our method preserves the global structure better than other three approaches including cropping, SNS [4] and FMO method [9]. 4 …”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 89%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Based on the results in Fig. 4, comparing the results of image downsizing to 75 % width of the original image, it is clear that our method preserves the global structure better than other three approaches including cropping, SNS [4] and FMO method [9]. 4 …”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…The retargeted results obtained by our improved resizing method are compared against those of ISC [2], as well as those of [4,7,8,9]. Figures in this paper show that outputs of our algorithm are more pleasant in visual.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…While some rely on the importance measure for switching [12,23,29], Dong et al present algorithms using an image distance function [13] or an operator cost-based approach [14]. The main difficulty when using hybrid methods is to find the optimal switching point between the operators as each viewer might prefer a different combination [67].…”
Section: Hybrid Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%