2013
DOI: 10.1016/j.compbiomed.2012.10.006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Fast opposite weight learning rules with application in breast cancer diagnosis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
27
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
5

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 68 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
27
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In general, for large databases, the input instances are divided into three equal-sized categories called training, validation, and testing; each category contains approximately 33% of the total input instances. To find the best architecture for the classifier, the average of 5 runs is computed [36,37]. In this paper, our prepared dataset, which contains the data of 126 cases, is partitioned into three groups.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In general, for large databases, the input instances are divided into three equal-sized categories called training, validation, and testing; each category contains approximately 33% of the total input instances. To find the best architecture for the classifier, the average of 5 runs is computed [36,37]. In this paper, our prepared dataset, which contains the data of 126 cases, is partitioned into three groups.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Due to the complex morphology of mass lesions that often appear with ambiguous and jagged contours and the nature of their surrounding fibroglandular breast tissue, the segmentation of masses is much more difficult compared with other findings such as calcification or architectural distortion. Several segmentation methods have been proposed in the literature to extract the precise contour of mammographic lesions which are roughly categorized into automatic [11,31,32], semiautomatic [33,34], and manually performed by the radiologist [18,35]. However, previous studies [36] have shown that there is no "one-fit-all" segmentation technique and none of the automatic and manual methods can provide fully accurate results for diverse mass lesions in mammograms.…”
Section: Segmentationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The performance of the dynamic algorithm has been compared to the BBP algorithm in [26], [27]. The speed up training is calculated using the formula [28]- [30]:…”
Section: Discussion On Performance Of the Dbbplr Algorithmmentioning
confidence: 99%