2015 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA) 2015
DOI: 10.1109/icra.2015.7139875
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Fast semantic segmentation of 3D point clouds using a dense CRF with learned parameters

Abstract: In this paper, we present an efficient semantic segmentation framework for indoor scenes operating on 3D point clouds. We use the results of a Random Forest Classifier to initialize the unary potentials of a densely interconnected Conditional Random Field, for which we learn the parameters for the pairwise potentials from training data. These potentials capture and model common spatial relations between class labels, which can often be observed in indoor scenes. We evaluate our approach on the popular NYU Dept… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
74
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 87 publications
(74 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
74
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The dataset contains 795 training and 654 testing samples. The training set is used to learn the network parameters as explained in Section III-B and 3 Available at http://cs.nyu.edu/ ∼ silberman/datasets/nyu depth v2.html Couprie et al [29] 64.5 63.5 Khan et al [30] 69.2 65.6 Stückler et al [31] 70.9 67.0 Müller and Behnke [32] 72.3 71.9 Wolf et al [33] 72.6 74.1 Eigen and Fergus [17] 79.1 80.6 Husain et al [4] …”
Section: A Semantic Segmentationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The dataset contains 795 training and 654 testing samples. The training set is used to learn the network parameters as explained in Section III-B and 3 Available at http://cs.nyu.edu/ ∼ silberman/datasets/nyu depth v2.html Couprie et al [29] 64.5 63.5 Khan et al [30] 69.2 65.6 Stückler et al [31] 70.9 67.0 Müller and Behnke [32] 72.3 71.9 Wolf et al [33] 72.6 74.1 Eigen and Fergus [17] 79.1 80.6 Husain et al [4] …”
Section: A Semantic Segmentationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…RELATED WORK The conventional approach to semantic labeling is carried out in multiple stages [4,[15][16][17][18][19]. This involves presegmenting the scene into smaller patches followed by feature extraction and classification.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hermans et al [17] used a randomized decision forest for semantic segmentation, where the results were further refined using a dense CRF. Similarly, segmentation followed by a random forest classification to initialize the unary potentials of a CRF was proposed by Wolf et al [18].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this paper we apply a similar framework to objects with significantly different characteristics. Our system differs from [15], by not including the CRF that is used for refining the labeling and by omitting the features that are specific to man-made object, as well as the features that utilize the orientation of the room. Figure 2 gives an overview of the pipeline for segmenting entrails into heart, liver, lung and misc.…”
Section: Segmentation Approachmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Two widely used datasets with these types of objects are the NYU V1 [12] and V2 [8] datasets. [15] is an example of recent work that addresses this type of data. They segment the point cloud into supervoxels and use a Random Forest (RF) classifier to initialize the unary potentials of a densely interconnected Conditional Random Field (CRF).…”
Section: Segmentation Approachmentioning
confidence: 99%