2006 IEEE/ION Position, Location, and Navigation Symposium
DOI: 10.1109/plans.2006.1650712
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Fast signal acquisition technology for new GPS/Galileo receivers

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
17
0
1

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
0
17
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Therefore, in one code period there are at least 20 460 samples, and in two periods there are at least 40 920 samples. The E1 signal has a code period of 4 ms, and when this signal is processed as a BOC(1,1) signal with the PCS, the usual minimum sampling frequency considered is 6.138 MHz (still assuming a complex sampling since the signal bandwidth is 4.092 MHz) [4], which is six times the chipping rate (the ratio between the sampling frequency and the chipping rate is higher for BOC than BPSK modulation because the autocorrelation functions are different [22] frequency is in the lower part of these ranges, this solution is not computationally efficient because it implies a lot of zeropadding and discarded samples. Note that the sampling frequencies given here are those required for the acquisition.…”
Section: Straightforward Solution (3-fft Solution)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, in one code period there are at least 20 460 samples, and in two periods there are at least 40 920 samples. The E1 signal has a code period of 4 ms, and when this signal is processed as a BOC(1,1) signal with the PCS, the usual minimum sampling frequency considered is 6.138 MHz (still assuming a complex sampling since the signal bandwidth is 4.092 MHz) [4], which is six times the chipping rate (the ratio between the sampling frequency and the chipping rate is higher for BOC than BPSK modulation because the autocorrelation functions are different [22] frequency is in the lower part of these ranges, this solution is not computationally efficient because it implies a lot of zeropadding and discarded samples. Note that the sampling frequencies given here are those required for the acquisition.…”
Section: Straightforward Solution (3-fft Solution)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Regarding the primary codes, the range is their length, e.g. 10 230 chips for the L5, E5a and E5b signals, and the usual step between two phases tested is 1/2 chip for a BPSK modulation and 1/6 chip for a BOC(1,1) modulation, which provides a maximum and average loss of 2.50 dB and 1.16 dB, respectively [16].…”
Section: Acquisitionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, for BOC signal, due to the appearance of side-peaks, △τ is chosen so that the tracking stage can avoid to lock to the side-peaks. For BOC(1,1), in order to achieve the same average correlation loss as for a BPSK signal, △τ BOC(1,1) = 0.16 chip (Wilde et al, 2006). As for Doppler shift dimension, △ f D = 2 3T int as in (Kaplan, 2005) or…”
Section: Conventional Acquisition Processmentioning
confidence: 99%