2011
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-246x.2011.04929.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Fast solution of geophysical inversion using adaptive mesh, space-filling curves and wavelet compression

Abstract: S U M M A R YMany geophysical inverse problems involve large and dense coefficient matrices that often exceed the limitations of physical memory in commonly available computers. The repeated multiplications of such matrices to vectors during processing or inversion require an immense amount of computing power. These two factors pose a significant challenge to solving largescale inverse problems in practice and can render many realistic problems intractable. To overcome these limitations, we develop a new compu… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
15
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 61 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 51 publications
0
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Alternatively, one can use so‐called model‐reduction techniques and let the actual regolith depth observations determine simultaneously the pattern and values of the DTB model parameters. Examples of such model‐reduction approaches include the discrete cosine transform [ Linde and Vrugt , ; Lochbühler et al ., ], wavelet transform [ Davis and Li , ; Jafarpour , ], and singular value decomposition [ Laloy et al ., ; Oware et al ., ]. We have tested this alternative approach in the present study but found little improvements in the quality of fit of the DTB model (not shown).…”
Section: Bayesian Inference With Dream: Synthetic Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Alternatively, one can use so‐called model‐reduction techniques and let the actual regolith depth observations determine simultaneously the pattern and values of the DTB model parameters. Examples of such model‐reduction approaches include the discrete cosine transform [ Linde and Vrugt , ; Lochbühler et al ., ], wavelet transform [ Davis and Li , ; Jafarpour , ], and singular value decomposition [ Laloy et al ., ; Oware et al ., ]. We have tested this alternative approach in the present study but found little improvements in the quality of fit of the DTB model (not shown).…”
Section: Bayesian Inference With Dream: Synthetic Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Low‐pass filtering suppresses the noise but blurs the signal and defeats the enhancement of multi‐source anomalies (Daubechies et al . ; Davis and Li ; Moreau et al . ; Trompat et al .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This allows for the use of standard closed-form prior distributions for the reduced set of parameters. Examples of such approaches include the discrete cosine transform (Jafarpour et al, 2009(Jafarpour et al, , 2010Linde and Vrugt, 2013;Lochbühler et al, 2015), wavelet transform (Davis and Li, 2011;Jafarpour, 2011), and singular value decomposition Oware et al, 2013).…”
Section: Prior Distributionmentioning
confidence: 99%