2018
DOI: 10.5194/amt-2018-27
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Fast time response measurements of particle size distributions in the 3–60 nm size range with the Nucleation Mode Aerosol Size Spectrometer

Abstract: Abstract. Earth's radiation budget is affected by new particle formation (NPF) and the growth of these nanometer-scale particles to larger sizes where they can directly scatter light or act as cloud condensation nuclei (CCN). Large uncertainties remain in the magnitude and spatiotemporal distribution of nucleation (less than 10 nm diameter) and Aitken (10–60 nm diameter) mode particles. Acquiring size-distribution measurements of these particles over large regions of the free troposphere is most easily accompl… Show more

Help me understand this report
View published versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In this study we compare the simulations with data on refractory BC measured by a Single‐Particle Soot Photometer during HIPPO from 2009 to 2011 (Schwarz et al, , ; Wofsy et al, ) and ATom from 2016 to 2017 (Wofsy et al, ); sea salt and accumulation mode aerosol mass concentration measured by Particle Analysis by Laser Mass Spectrometry (PALMS; Froyd et al, ; Murphy et al, ) during ATom; the aerosol size distribution measured by the Aerosol Microphysical Properties instrument package (Kupc et al, ; Williamson et al, ) during ATom; and size distributions measured by the Printed Optical Particle Spectrometer (Gao et al, ) on an instrumented balloon over Kunming, China, in August 2015 (Yu et al, ).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this study we compare the simulations with data on refractory BC measured by a Single‐Particle Soot Photometer during HIPPO from 2009 to 2011 (Schwarz et al, , ; Wofsy et al, ) and ATom from 2016 to 2017 (Wofsy et al, ); sea salt and accumulation mode aerosol mass concentration measured by Particle Analysis by Laser Mass Spectrometry (PALMS; Froyd et al, ; Murphy et al, ) during ATom; the aerosol size distribution measured by the Aerosol Microphysical Properties instrument package (Kupc et al, ; Williamson et al, ) during ATom; and size distributions measured by the Printed Optical Particle Spectrometer (Gao et al, ) on an instrumented balloon over Kunming, China, in August 2015 (Yu et al, ).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Equations and are both purely observationally constrained and therefore are not affected by model uncertainties. HR‐AMS‐measured PM 1 OA mass concentration (DeCarlo et al, ; Nault et al, ; Schroder et al, ) is used in equation , and total aerosol surface area (nucleation, Aitken, accumulation modes) calculated from AMP measurements (Brock et al, ; Kupc et al, ; Williamson et al, ) is used in equation . Figure shows the combined results from both ATom‐1 and ATom‐2, excluding measurements below 3 km (where oceanic emissions play an important role).…”
Section: On the Currently Missing Ch3cho Production Mechanismsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The volume mixing ratio of HCHO in air was measured in ATom flight data. A large number of gas and aerosol payloads were deployed on NASA's DC-8 aircraft, and the HCHO on NASA's high-altitude aircraft was measured by ISAF instrument [40,41]. The instrument uses laser-induced fluorescence (LIF) to obtain the high sensitivity needed to detect HCHO in the upper troposphere and lower stratosphere, which has an abundance of 10 parts per trillion.…”
Section: In-situ Datamentioning
confidence: 99%