2016
DOI: 10.1364/ol.41.002783
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Fast wide-field Raman spectroscopic imaging based on simultaneous multi-channel image acquisition and Wiener estimation

Abstract: Raman spectroscopic imaging is a powerful label-free tool for studying cells and tissues in biology and medicine, but it suffers from extremely slow data acquisition. In this Letter, a novel multi-channel Raman imaging technique is proposed to speed up Raman acquisition. Wide-field Raman images are taken in multiple narrow-band channels, each through a different bandpass filter, simultaneously in one camera frame. Then Wiener estimation is used to quickly reconstruct the full Raman spectrum at each pixel from … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The total estimated scan time for tissue samples with areas of 1 × 1 cm 2 would be around 2.7 hours (100 × 100 μm 2 superpixel, 1 second per step). Future developments could combine this approach with other speed up approaches (eg, line‐scanning confocal , multifocal and Wiener estimation ) aimed to further reduce the acquisition time for intraoperative use (eg, <1 hour). When compared to gold standard diagnostics such as histopathology, the sensitivity of 82% is still not acceptable for cancer detection.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The total estimated scan time for tissue samples with areas of 1 × 1 cm 2 would be around 2.7 hours (100 × 100 μm 2 superpixel, 1 second per step). Future developments could combine this approach with other speed up approaches (eg, line‐scanning confocal , multifocal and Wiener estimation ) aimed to further reduce the acquisition time for intraoperative use (eg, <1 hour). When compared to gold standard diagnostics such as histopathology, the sensitivity of 82% is still not acceptable for cancer detection.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several studies have accelerated spontaneous Raman measurements using sparse sampling techniques (sampling at 10‐20 μm increments ) collecting a full spectrum at each pixel at the expense of limited coverage of the tissue surface area (2% or less). Other methods that have been developed include line‐scanning confocal , 2D multifocal arrays and Wiener estimation , with speed up factors reported between ×10 and ×100). One attractive approach is superpixel acquisition whereby a spectrum is averaged over a larger pixel (aka a superpixel of ~25 × 25 μm 2 ‐100 × 100 μm 2 ) on the sample surface while integrating only once on the detector.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several strategies have been proposed for increasing the speed of Raman hyperspectral imaging, including multifoci excitation, line scanning, and wide-field Raman imaging. 10,[22][23][24] One of the most direct approaches to such sampling is simply to create multiple parallelized laser excitation points for readout. Many approaches to this have been demonstrated, from using fixed optical elements such as lens arrays, 22,25,26 to scanning galvo mirrors, [27][28][29] and LC-SLMs.…”
Section: Spatially Controlled Spontaneous Raman Excitationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several techniques have been proposed and demonstrated for achieving fast Raman spectral mapping, such as line‐ or slit‐scanning and wide‐field Raman imaging . Compared with confocal single‐beam scanning Raman imaging, these power‐sharing Raman imaging techniques effectively shorten the mapping time by measuring multiple sample locations simultaneously.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%