2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.chemgeo.2021.120385
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Faster geospeedometry: A Monte Carlo approach to relaxational geospeedometry for determining cooling rates of volcanic glasses

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Additional details of the method using the specific Tool-Narayanaswamy geospeedometer can be found in Kenderes and Whittington (2021).…”
Section: Relaxation Geospeedometrymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Additional details of the method using the specific Tool-Narayanaswamy geospeedometer can be found in Kenderes and Whittington (2021).…”
Section: Relaxation Geospeedometrymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Previous studies that have applied relaxation geospeedometry to natural volcanic systems using the Tool-Narayanaswamy geospeedometer have required repeat CP measurements of the same sample with controlled experimental thermal histories. Repeat measurements are used to constrain four model parameters, however, Kenderes and Whittington (2021) demonstrated that similar natural cooling rate estimates can be identified using a single CP measurement. Following this method, the five unknown parameters must be solved simultaneously using a numerical solver called CoolMonte written in MATLAB.…”
Section: Relaxation Geospeedometrymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Afterwards, two empirical parameters (β and ξ) ranging between 0 and 1 are fitted by tweaking them to minimize the root square mean error to derive T f and thereby the unknown cooling rate (q c ). Kenderes and Whittington (2021) have recently provided a Matlab code to derive the four kinetic parameters without the need to perform multiple heat capacity measurements. However, the TNM approach cannot model the broad exothermic enthalpy relaxation upon DSC upscan before the glass transition interval typical of hyperquenched glasses (Yue et al 2002;Potuzak et al 2008;Nichols et al 2009;Zheng et al 2019).…”
Section: Theoretical Background and Experimental Challengesmentioning
confidence: 99%