1998
DOI: 10.1038/sj.bmt.1701298
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Faster neutrophil and platelet engraftment, but no differences in acute GVHD or survival, using peripheral blood stem cells from related and unrelated donors, compared to bone marrow

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

2
29
0

Year Published

1999
1999
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 36 publications
(31 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
2
29
0
Order By: Relevance
“…18 However, PBSCT did not reduce the rates of CMV infection and CMV disease. 19 Similarly, PBSCT recipients do not seem to clear HHV-6 DNAemia more rapidly than BMT recipients, as shown in this study.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 61%
“…18 However, PBSCT did not reduce the rates of CMV infection and CMV disease. 19 Similarly, PBSCT recipients do not seem to clear HHV-6 DNAemia more rapidly than BMT recipients, as shown in this study.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 61%
“…17 Engraftment was assessed according to published criteria. 7 Briefly, myeloid engraftment was defined as the first of 3 consecutive days when the absolute neutrophil count was higher than 0.5 × 10 9 /l.…”
Section: Evaluation and Definitionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Whether the incidence of cGVHD increased in patients undergoing alloPBSCT is still controversial. [8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17] There appears to be a trend towards a higher incidence of cGVHD. 18 Our previous retrospective comparative study (containing standard as well as high risk patients) showed an increased cGVHD compared to bone marrow (24.1% vs 78.1%).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While faster neutrophil and platelet engraftment with shorter duration of hospitalization and lower antibiotic use have been seen compared to BMT, 8,9 whether or not GVHD is more common and the relapse rate is different, is not yet clear. [8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15][16][17] In this report, we summarize our experience with alloPBSCT in standard risk leukemia: AML in first complete remission (CR), or CML in early first chronic phase.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%