IEEE INFOCOM 2019 - IEEE Conference on Computer Communications 2019
DOI: 10.1109/infocom.2019.8737378
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Faster Placement of Virtual Machines through Adaptive Caching

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In (9), the first term is the fixed cost associated with activating VM m, which is incurred only if m is not already active (the summation can be at most 1, as per (3)). The second term is the proportional cost associated with the additional computation capability needed at VM m to guarantee stability, with ✏ being a positive, arbitrarily small value.…”
Section: A Steps 1-2: Bipartite Graph and Hungarian Algorithmmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In (9), the first term is the fixed cost associated with activating VM m, which is incurred only if m is not already active (the summation can be at most 1, as per (3)). The second term is the proportional cost associated with the additional computation capability needed at VM m to guarantee stability, with ✏ being a positive, arbitrarily small value.…”
Section: A Steps 1-2: Bipartite Graph and Hungarian Algorithmmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Importantly, significant cost savings can be achieved by sharing individual VNFs or sub-slices among services, whenever possible. The vast majority of VNF placement studies [6]- [9] consider scenarios where all placement decisions are made by a centralized entity, often the NFV Orchestrator (NFVO) in the ETSI Management and Orchestration (MANO) framework [5], [10]. Also, such an entity is in the position to make finegrained decisions on the usage of individual hosts and links.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In Cloud context, the scheduler remains of interest without considerations of virtualization and its overheads [28] and [29]. The Openstack scheduler performance can be enhanced as per developer's view point discussed in [30] and [31]. Detailed comparisons of Openstack features with the other open source solutions such as OpenNebola and VMware are presented in [32]- [34], and [35] in detail.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A great deal of previous research into VM consolidation has focused on reducing the number of PMs in a cloud datacenter, while VM consolidation schemes often pursue different performance objectives [20,21]. Also, resource contention between colocated VMs and operational interference issues are not accurately investigated [7,22,23]. It is critical to evaluate the resilience to interference of migrating VM from other colocated VMs prior to consolidating them together on a same PM.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%