2007
DOI: 10.1016/s0026-0657(07)70147-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Faster sintering and lower costs with ultra-fine MIM powders

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

1
4
1

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
1
4
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Density of sintered body was higher at same sintering temperature when average particle size of powder was smaller. This result is similar to the trend reported by Bose et al (2007) in metal injection molding. Results show that the smaller the average particle size, the better the sintering performance and the higher the density of the sintered body at low temperatures, even in water atomized powder for binder jetting.…”
Section: Density Of Sintered Bodysupporting
confidence: 92%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Density of sintered body was higher at same sintering temperature when average particle size of powder was smaller. This result is similar to the trend reported by Bose et al (2007) in metal injection molding. Results show that the smaller the average particle size, the better the sintering performance and the higher the density of the sintered body at low temperatures, even in water atomized powder for binder jetting.…”
Section: Density Of Sintered Bodysupporting
confidence: 92%
“…In powder metallurgy, when sintering is performed under the same conditions (same temperature, heating rate, and time), finer powder has higher sinterability and better mechanical properties (Bose et al, 2007;Toyoshima et al, 2006). In the same way, if water atomized ultrafine powder with an average particle size of 5 microns or less is used in the binder jetting, the same sintering density is expected to be obtained at a lower sintering temperature than the gas atomized powder with an average particle size of 10 microns currently in use.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Powder injection molding (PIM) offers an attractive method for producing smart, complex shape components cost effectively and it is equally applicable for metals and ceramics [1,2]. PIM process consists of feedstock preparation, injection molding, debinding and sintering [2].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, some of the disadvantages encountered with the use of finer particles include agglomeration, which adversely affects the homogeneity of the feedstock, necessitating longer debinding times and higher powder procurement cost. Coarser powder particles, in contrast, give higher packing efficiency, reduced sintering shrinkage rates, shorter debinding times and are typically cheap and easy to handle, but the product quality is often inferior (Bose et al, 2008;German, 1992;Hausnerova, Kitano and Saha, 2010). …”
mentioning
confidence: 99%