2020 IEEE International Conference on Big Data (Big Data) 2020
DOI: 10.1109/bigdata50022.2020.9377871
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

FasterRCNN Monitoring of Road Damages: Competition and Deployment

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…On both the training and the testing datasets, the model generated some false positives when there was no road damage. The calculated F1 score is 0.853, which is better than the performance of the networks for the same purpose in[19][20][21][22][23][24]. Overall, the results show that the trained YOLO model is especially good at telling cracks from potholes, but can sometimes make mistakes in distinguishing undamaged roads from damage.…”
mentioning
confidence: 84%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…On both the training and the testing datasets, the model generated some false positives when there was no road damage. The calculated F1 score is 0.853, which is better than the performance of the networks for the same purpose in[19][20][21][22][23][24]. Overall, the results show that the trained YOLO model is especially good at telling cracks from potholes, but can sometimes make mistakes in distinguishing undamaged roads from damage.…”
mentioning
confidence: 84%
“…The authors of [20] used a variant of Fast R-CNN, the bi-directional feature pyramid network (BiFPN), and achieved an F1 score of 0.6455. Other participating teams also used variants of YOLO [21,22] or R-CNN [23,24], and their F1 scores were between 0.5 and 0.66.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Deep learning methods, such as Fast R-CNN [1], Faster R-CNN [2], and Cascade RCNN [3], are commonly used for crack detection. Various detection models [4][5][6] apply these methods. Pei et al [7] applied the Cascade RCNN and introduced a consistency filtering mechanism, leveraging self-supervised learning to make the most of unlabeled data.…”
Section: Crack Detectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The second category is the object detection, which determines the road damage in very fine resolution imagery using a detection box [34], [35], [36]. It includes the one-step methods that directly detect the damage [9], [37], [38], and the two-step methods that use a detection step following classification [39], [40], [41], [42]. These methods generally used rectangular boxes to locate the detected damaged objects.…”
Section: B Deep Learningmentioning
confidence: 99%